Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Scott Sommers

Hematology & Oncology Columbia, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1932275336 CMS profile 133662

166 Stoneridge Dr, Columbia, SC 29210

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,967

445 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Scott Sommers of Columbia, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,967 across 445 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 69th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,877 88
2024 General $2,078 93
2023 General $1,393 74
2022 General $1,589 62
2021 General $33 2
2020 General $301 19
2019 General $1,695 107

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Scott Sommers
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Scott Sommers were reported at $1,877. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Scott Sommers Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,695 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $301 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $33 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $1,589 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $1,393 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $2,078 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $1,877 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,066 47 payments
  2. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $668 40 payments
  3. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $614 27 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $553 34 payments
  5. Celgene Corporation $486 27 payments
  6. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $460 23 payments
  7. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $356 14 payments
  8. Astellas Pharma US Inc $310 17 payments
  9. AbbVie, Inc. $289 13 payments
  10. Heron Therapeutics, Inc. $275 2 payments
  11. Other $3,891 201 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,889 440 payments
  2. Education $78 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. KEYTRUDA $556 25 payments
  2. KISQALI $420 20 payments
  3. REBLOZYL $336 18 payments
  4. OPDIVO $270 18 payments
  5. SUSTOL $254 1 payment
  6. TUKYSA $239 15 payments
  7. DARZALEX $237 13 payments
  8. IBRANCE $209 13 payments
  9. XTANDI $196 13 payments
  10. SCEMBLIX $191 7 payments
  11. Other $8,038 416 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 20 drugs

Part D claims

807

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$811,391

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

8.9%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Pomalyst Pomalidomide Brand 11 $253,596
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 11 $224,894
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 14 $218,822
Imatinib Mesylate Generic 16 $76,183
Toremifene Citrate Generic 15 $13,211
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 12 $6,944
Letrozole Generic 224 $6,819
Tamoxifen Citrate Generic 91 $2,737
Exemestane Generic 13 $1,291
Hydroxyurea Generic 35 $1,278

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 20 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 196 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$5,019,805

Of which drugs: $4,477,944

Medicare patients

1,106

Average age 75

Services billed

284,111

655 women, 451 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Cancer 63%
Arthritis 46%
Diabetes 37%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Heart failure 21%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, pembrolizumab, 1 mg J9271 Office 35 19,400 $867,570
Injection, daratumumab, 10 mg and hyaluronidase-fihj J9144 Office 13 10,260 $399,993
Injection, nivolumab, 1 mg J9299 Office 14 14,940 $358,890
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 67 17,220 $351,226
Injection, pemetrexed (pemfexy), 10 mg J9304 Office 11 3,535 $162,255
Injection, eflapegrastim-xnst, 0.1 mg J1449 Office 36 7,128 $151,687
Injection, granisetron, extended-release, 0.1 mg J1627 Office 40 9,700 $42,725
Injection, ferric carboxymaltose, 1 mg J1439 Office 50 46,500 $40,264
Injection, pegfilgrastim-jmdb, biosimilar, (fulphila), 0.5 mg Q5108 Office 13 240 $26,958
Leuprolide acetate (for depot suspension), 7.5 mg J9217 Office 29 171 $23,305

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 67 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
PEMFEXY
  • Eagle Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $155
$155 — 3,535
KEYTRUDA
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $139
$139 — —
SCEMBLIX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $98
$98 — —
REBLOZYL
  • Celgene Corporation $66
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $28
$94 — —
ENHERTU
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $84
$84 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 67 with Patron

Records

445 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record