Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Scott Kawamoto

Rheumatology Honolulu, HI Medical Doctor

NPI 1245441583 CMS profile 147735

550 S Beretania St, Suite 514, Honolulu, HI 96813

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$58,030

675 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Scott Kawamoto of Honolulu, HI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $58,030 across 675 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 90th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,241 140
2024 General $3,687 123
2023 General $3,145 107
2022 General $1,881 71
2021 General $2,955 28
2020 General $3,610 32
2019 General $39,510 174

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Scott Kawamoto
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Scott Kawamoto were reported at $3,241. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Scott Kawamoto Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $39,510 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $3,610 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $2,955 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,881 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $3,145 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $3,687 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $3,241 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $46,037 182 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,591 104 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,877 41 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,342 43 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $1,112 74 payments
  6. UCB, Inc. $1,001 64 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $991 36 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $815 44 payments
  9. Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $241 10 payments
  10. Genzyme Corporation $231 4 payments
  11. Other $1,791 73 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $37,873 20 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $16,721 645 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $3,378 8 payments
  4. Education $57 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Prolia $28,436 52 payments
  2. EVENITY $15,297 39 payments
  3. RINVOQ $1,987 80 payments
  4. Otezla $1,370 62 payments
  5. SAPHNELO $1,246 33 payments
  6. BENLYSTA $1,188 41 payments
  7. TALTZ $959 35 payments
  8. XELJANZ $758 50 payments
  9. Enbrel $744 32 payments
  10. KRYSTEXXA $508 15 payments
  11. Other $6,965 348 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 35 drugs

Part D claims

1,815

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,876,944

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

29.5%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 43 $411,004
Krystexxa Pegloticase Brand 12 $348,039
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 41 $282,077
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 26 $187,455
Prolia Denosumab Brand 68 $119,911
Saphnelo Anifrolumab-Fnia Brand 22 $110,362
Otezla Apremilast Brand 21 $104,084
Enbrel Mini Etanercept Brand 14 $102,428
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 13 $72,850
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 13 $47,311

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 35 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 13 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$122,574

Of which drugs: $4,636

Medicare patients

560

Average age 75

Services billed

2,766

439 women, 121 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 73%
Osteoporosis 43%
Chronic kidney disease 31%
Diabetes 26%
Ischemic heart disease 18%
Cancer 12%
COPD 11%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Hyaluronan or derivative, hyalgan, supartz or visco-3, for intra-articular injection, per dose J7321 Office 12 80 $4,469
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 18 1,050 $106
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 11 13 $60

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 24 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
EVENITY
  • Amgen Inc. $781
$781 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $552
$552 41 —
KRYSTEXXA
  • Amgen Inc. $344
$344 12 —
SAPHNELO
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $201
$201 22 —
XELJANZ
  • PFIZER INC. $192
$192 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 24 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

675 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Hawaii

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record