Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sanjay Sethi

Medical Oncology Sugar Land, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1326081274 CMS profile 628673

1350 First Colony Blvd, Sugar Land, TX 77479

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,125

64 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Sanjay Sethi of Sugar Land, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,125 across 64 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 41st percentile of Medical Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $995 39
2024 General $301 8
2023 General $117 5
2022 General $280 3
2021 General $12 1
2020 General $63 1
2019 General $358 7

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sanjay Sethi
  • Medical Oncology median
  • Middle half of Medical Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sanjay Sethi were reported at $995. Among 3,316 Medical Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,128 and the middle half received between $147 and $5,675.

Show as a table
Year Sanjay Sethi Medical Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $358 $968 $140–$6,658 $163
2020 $63 $747 $102–$5,891 $114
2021 $12 $430 $50–$4,098 $132
2022 $280 $812 $127–$4,907 $149
2023 $117 $957 $144–$5,248 $160
2024 $301 $1,042 $149–$5,650 $164
2025 $995 $1,128 $147–$5,675 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $309 7 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $262 12 payments
  3. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $198 4 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $194 7 payments
  5. Astellas Pharma US Inc $144 3 payments
  6. Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc. $139 1 payment
  7. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $134 2 payments
  8. Celgene Corporation $106 4 payments
  9. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $103 3 payments
  10. Circassia Pharmaceuticals Inc $103 1 payment
  11. Other $433 20 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,040 58 payments
  2. Education $86 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Trodelvy $278 5 payments
  2. REBLOZYL $155 2 payments
  3. XTANDI $150 3 payments
  4. XPOVIO $139 1 payment
  5. KEYTRUDA $134 2 payments
  6. DARZALEX $134 5 payments
  7. TALVEY $111 4 payments
  8. NIOX VERO $103 1 payment
  9. ERLEADA $102 5 payments
  10. BRUKINSA $97 4 payments
  11. Other $858 38 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 17 drugs

Part D claims

420

Median for Medical Oncology: 414

Drug cost

$1,519,296

Median for Medical Oncology: $849,427

Branded share of claims

37.6%

Median for Medical Oncology: 28.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 29 $524,497
Inlyta Axitinib Brand 12 $223,806
Jakafi Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 12 $208,417
Verzenio Abemaciclib Brand 13 $185,632
Ibrance Palbociclib Brand 11 $176,694
Abiraterone Acetate Generic 19 $88,728
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 52 $55,572
Nexavar Sorafenib Tosylate Brand 13 $27,193
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 16 $23,660
Imatinib Mesylate Generic 25 $2,477

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 17 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,431 Part D prescribers listed as Medical Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 135 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$943,717

Of which drugs: $673,974

Medicare patients

416

Average age 74

Services billed

53,870

201 women, 215 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Cancer 52%
Arthritis 44%
Ischemic heart disease 39%
Diabetes 38%
Chronic kidney disease 38%
Heart failure 28%
Atrial fibrillation 26%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, fosaprepitant, 1 mg J1453 Office 15 4,200 $481
Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9967 Office 34 3,710 $371
Injection, palonosetron hcl, 25 mcg J2469 Office 19 520 $358
Injection, granisetron hydrochloride, 100 mcg J1626 Office 13 610 $146
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 27 948 $83
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg J1200 Office 19 48 $30

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 7 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Trodelvy
  • Gilead Sciences, Inc. $125
$125 — —
BRUKINSA
  • BeiGene USA, Inc. $42
$42 — —
ENHERTU
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $29
$29 — —
Pomalyst
  • Celgene Corporation $28
$28 — —
PADCEV
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $19
$19 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 7 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

64 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Medical Oncology in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record