Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sandeep Viswanath

Rheumatology Lakeland, FL Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1154761328 CMS profile 52604

1600 Lakeland Hills Blvd, Lakeland, FL 33805

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$17,342

912 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Sandeep Viswanath of Lakeland, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $17,342 across 912 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 80th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,817 183
2024 General $3,789 179
2023 General $2,914 161
2022 General $1,714 100
2021 General $2,303 137
2020 General $1,119 60
2019 General $1,686 92

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sandeep Viswanath
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sandeep Viswanath were reported at $3,817. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Sandeep Viswanath Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,686 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $1,119 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $2,303 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,714 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $2,914 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $3,789 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $3,817 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $3,451 190 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $3,222 163 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,567 74 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $1,544 90 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $1,370 80 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,029 57 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $812 42 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $746 37 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $708 36 payments
  10. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $528 30 payments
  11. Other $2,366 113 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $17,151 907 payments
  2. Education $191 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $2,221 107 payments
  2. TREMFYA $1,479 69 payments
  3. XELJANZ $1,370 80 payments
  4. Enbrel $1,345 71 payments
  5. Otezla $1,343 73 payments
  6. Cimzia $895 54 payments
  7. COSENTYX $861 52 payments
  8. BENLYSTA $812 42 payments
  9. HUMIRA $758 42 payments
  10. Prolia $755 48 payments
  11. Other $9,157 476 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 28 drugs

Part D claims

4,114

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$2,630,197

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

24.6%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 107 $847,711
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 57 $659,196
Otezla Apremilast Brand 69 $339,652
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 39 $218,923
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 17 $133,683
Orencia Abatacept Brand 24 $131,489
Actemra Actpen Tocilizumab Brand 36 $126,185
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 12 $65,403
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 714 $26,100
Leflunomide Generic 272 $25,227

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 28 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 14 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$92,149

Of which drugs: $233

Medicare patients

371

Average age 74

Services billed

2,139

286 women, 85 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Chronic kidney disease 38%
Diabetes 36%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Depression 31%
COPD 26%
Osteoporosis 24%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 17 965 $98
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 16 43 $21

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 29 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Enbrel
$521 107 —
RINVOQ
$500 17 —
TREMFYA
$369 — —
SKYRIZI
$295 — —
Cimzia
$262 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 29 with Patron

Records

912 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record