Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sadia Chohan

Hematology & Oncology Oklahoma City, OK Medical Doctor

NPI 1306890074 CMS profile 58612

3525 Nw 56Th St, Oklahoma City, OK 73112

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$13,365

670 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Sadia Chohan of Oklahoma City, OK is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $13,365 across 670 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 75th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,459 124
2024 General $2,494 128
2023 General $2,116 107
2022 General $1,866 106
2021 General $1,551 89
2020 General $881 55
2019 General $999 61

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sadia Chohan
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sadia Chohan were reported at $3,459. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Sadia Chohan Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $999 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $881 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $1,551 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $1,866 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $2,116 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $2,494 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $3,459 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $2,245 69 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $1,351 94 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $780 41 payments
  4. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $596 31 payments
  5. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $551 26 payments
  6. Genentech USA, Inc. $431 24 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $400 22 payments
  8. Genzyme Corporation $358 18 payments
  9. Eisai Inc. $343 17 payments
  10. AbbVie, Inc. $327 13 payments
  11. Other $5,984 315 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $11,094 588 payments
  2. Long term medical supply or device loan $1,280 13 payments
  3. Education $992 69 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. KISQALI $1,646 36 payments
  2. IBRANCE $902 71 payments
  3. KEYTRUDA $577 30 payments
  4. ENHERTU $352 16 payments
  5. Lenvima $343 17 payments
  6. LIBTAYO $319 16 payments
  7. OPDIVO $256 17 payments
  8. IMBRUVICA $224 11 payments
  9. BRAFTOVI $213 11 payments
  10. MEKTOVI $213 11 payments
  11. Other $11,331 596 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 30 drugs

Part D claims

1,612

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$3,817,506

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

20.2%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jakafi Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 84 $1,483,750
Ibrance Palbociclib Brand 43 $695,252
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 23 $419,034
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 22 $386,835
Pomalyst Pomalidomide Brand 15 $335,560
Verzenio Abemaciclib Brand 11 $196,575
Xtandi Enzalutamide Brand 12 $170,839
Imatinib Mesylate Generic 61 $67,966
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 29 $26,292
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 21 $13,347

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 30 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 21 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$179,286

Of which drugs: $919

Medicare patients

705

Average age 75

Services billed

11,031

444 women, 261 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 52%
Cancer 46%
Diabetes 37%
Ischemic heart disease 36%
Chronic kidney disease 33%
COPD 29%
Depression 24%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9967 Office 58 8,901 $919

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 64 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
IBRANCE
$256 43 —
KISQALI
$192 — —
KEYTRUDA
$123 — —
ENHERTU
$106 — —
Lenvima
$92 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 64 with Patron

Records

670 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record