Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Robert Siegel

Hematology & Oncology Washington, DC Medical Doctor

NPI 1003985367 CMS profile 272571

2150 Pennsylvania Ave Nw, Washington, DC 20037

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,811

182 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$74,047 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2021

Through program year 2025, Robert Siegel of Washington, DC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,811 across 182 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $74,047 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 59th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,436 53
2024 General $1,123 50
2023 General $730 38
2022 General $856 29
2021 General $259 4
2020 General $37 2
2019 General $370 6

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Robert Siegel
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Robert Siegel were reported at $1,436. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Robert Siegel Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $370 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $37 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $259 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $856 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $730 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $1,123 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $1,436 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $447 25 payments
  2. Astellas Pharma US Inc $421 7 payments
  3. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $377 17 payments
  4. Seattle Genetics, Inc. $310 4 payments
  5. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $255 11 payments
  6. Incyte Corporation $222 7 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $213 9 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $190 2 payments
  9. Genentech USA, Inc. $179 9 payments
  10. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $175 8 payments
  11. Other $2,023 83 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,149 172 payments
  2. Education $662 10 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. KEYTRUDA $346 16 payments
  2. MONJUVI $222 7 payments
  3. TECVAYLI $183 8 payments
  4. IBRANCE $165 9 payments
  5. BRUKINSA $149 2 payments
  6. DARZALEX $148 7 payments
  7. PAXLOVID $141 9 payments
  8. GammaTile $125 1 payment
  9. XTANDI $124 7 payments
  10. LYNPARZA $122 1 payment
  11. Other $3,851 180 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 21 drugs

Part D claims

488

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$2,770,455

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

43.9%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xtandi Enzalutamide Brand 101 $1,260,776
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 38 $501,691
Lenalidomide Generic 26 $357,569
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 17 $311,612
Brukinsa Zanubrutinib Brand 14 $164,525
Abiraterone Acetate Generic 44 $90,053
Orgovyx Relugolix Brand 17 $46,055
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 11 $14,576
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 16 $12,359
Toremifene Citrate Generic 12 $4,638

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 21 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 68 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,312,539

Of which drugs: $1,210,154

Medicare patients

294

Average age 76

Services billed

66,427

158 women, 136 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Cancer 56%
Arthritis 56%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Diabetes 23%
Osteoporosis 21%
Depression 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 25 5,040 $103,666
Leuprolide acetate (for depot suspension), 7.5 mg J9217 Office 23 222 $30,973

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 45 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
CABOMETYX
  • Exelixis Inc. $75
$75 — —
KEYTRUDA
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $73
$73 — —
TUKYSA
  • PFIZER INC. $53
$53 — —
KISQALI
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $48
$48 — —
IBRANCE
  • PFIZER INC. $46
$46 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 45 with Patron

Records

182 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in District of Columbia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record