Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Philip Doh

Pain Medicine Los Angeles, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1679511638 CMS profile 121583

266 S Harvard Blvd, # 350, Los Angeles, CA 90004

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$29,588

1,072 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Philip Doh of Los Angeles, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $29,588 across 1,072 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,856 80
2024 General $3,028 93
2023 General $5,289 123
2022 General $5,492 185
2021 General $8,787 295
2020 General $2,323 149
2019 General $2,815 147

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Philip Doh
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Philip Doh were reported at $1,856. Among 2,779 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $458 and the middle half received between $124 and $1,401.

Show as a table
Year Philip Doh Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,815 $498 $126–$1,682 $163
2020 $2,323 $284 $80–$910 $114
2021 $8,787 $399 $112–$1,219 $132
2022 $5,492 $455 $137–$1,484 $149
2023 $5,289 $484 $128–$1,495 $160
2024 $3,028 $498 $131–$1,540 $164
2025 $1,856 $458 $124–$1,401 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. IBSA Pharma Inc. $10,743 235 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $4,406 161 payments
  3. Radius Health, Inc. $4,358 180 payments
  4. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $1,781 106 payments
  5. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $1,009 19 payments
  6. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $1,006 58 payments
  7. RedHill Biopharma Inc. $828 42 payments
  8. Almatica Pharma LLC $813 46 payments
  9. AbbVie, Inc. $713 15 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $676 41 payments
  11. Other $3,256 169 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $22,677 1,061 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $6,900 7 payments
  3. Education $7 3 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $4 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Licart $10,638 234 payments
  2. Flector $4,505 82 payments
  3. EVENITY $3,268 126 payments
  4. Tymlos Endocrinology $2,579 111 payments
  5. Tirosint $2,168 144 payments
  6. Prolia $2,138 104 payments
  7. Tymlos Endocrinology $1,647 68 payments
  8. RELISTOR Gastroenterology $1,037 57 payments
  9. DUPIXENT $1,009 19 payments
  10. RELISTOR Gastroenterology $744 49 payments
  11. Other $10,621 531 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 24 drugs

Part D claims

2,130

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 1,220

Drug cost

$1,945,345

Median for Interventional Pain Management: $39,344

Branded share of claims

53.3%

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 34.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Tymlos Abaloparatide Brand 236 $618,053
Licart Diclofenac Epolamine Brand 384 $579,839
Prolia Denosumab Brand 127 $216,444
Horizant Gabapentin Enacarbil Brand 116 $128,635
Relistor Methylnaltrexone Bromide Brand 21 $93,708
Evenity (2 Syringes) Romosozumab-Aqqg Brand 34 $82,347
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 18 $67,322
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 65 $62,294
Teriparatide Generic 11 $26,437
Belbuca Buprenorphine Hcl Brand 23 $15,633

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 24 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,476 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 30 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$184,089

Of which drugs: $67,038

Medicare patients

144

Average age 80

Services billed

9,046

95 women, 49 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 67%
Diabetes 63%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Depression 26%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Heart failure 23%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Hyaluronan or derivative, orthovisc, for intra-articular injection, per dose J7324 Office 25 173 $17,015
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 75 647 $508
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 60 663 $344
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 13 200 $18

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 9 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Licart
$1,530 384 —
Tymlos
$704 236 —
Tirosint
$205 — —
HORIZANT
$154 116 —
RELISTOR
$153 21 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,072 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record