Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Norman Liu

Ophthalmology Garden Grove, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1861492860 CMS profile 311564

12665 Garden Grove Blvd, Suite 401, Garden Grove, CA 92843

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,168

183 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$122,644

Paid to them · 5 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$738,979 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2024

Through program year 2025, Norman Liu of Garden Grove, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,168 across 183 general payments and $122,644 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $738,979 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $385 16
2024 General $309 12
2023 General $348 19
2022 General $358 18
2021 General $435 29
2020 General $1,259 30
2020 Research $61,193 2
2019 General $1,074 59
2019 Research $61,451 3

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Norman Liu
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Norman Liu were reported at $385. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Norman Liu Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,074 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $1,259 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $435 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $358 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $348 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $309 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $385 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Bausch Health US, LLC $800 1 payment
  2. Alcon Vision LLC $661 33 payments
  3. Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $588 50 payments
  4. Allergan Inc. $450 21 payments
  5. Shire North American Group Inc $300 13 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $248 15 payments
  7. Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. $208 8 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $171 7 payments
  9. AbbVie, Inc. $118 5 payments
  10. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $106 6 payments
  11. Other $519 24 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,330 180 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $800 1 payment
  3. Gift $39 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. CVISC50 $800 1 payment
  2. rhopressa Glaucoma $422 32 payments
  3. rocklatan Glaucoma $398 31 payments
  4. XIIDRA $300 13 payments
  5. Rocklatan Ophthalmology $274 15 payments
  6. Rhopressa Glaucoma $221 21 payments
  7. TEPEZZA $171 7 payments
  8. Rocklatan Glaucoma $165 16 payments
  9. TYRVAYA $141 5 payments
  10. RESTASIS $106 6 payments
  11. Other $1,912 104 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Bausch Health US, LLC $122,644 5 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 28 drugs

Part D claims

2,850

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$407,777

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

28.1%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xiidra Lifitegrast Brand 193 $145,053
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 79 $51,563
Rhopressa Netarsudil Mesylate Brand 138 $47,329
Cyclosporine Generic 138 $40,174
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 65 $31,941
Rocklatan Netarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost Brand 36 $13,600
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 229 $8,510
Latanoprost Generic 1,016 $8,311
Vyzulta Latanoprostene Bunod Brand 18 $8,143
Restasis Multidose Cyclosporine Brand 12 $7,853

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 28 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 31 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$172,544

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

651

Average age 74

Services billed

2,254

400 women, 251 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 49%
Arthritis 40%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Osteoporosis 23%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Depression 18%
COPD 17%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

4 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TYRVAYA
  • Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. $85
$85 — —
TEPEZZA
  • Amgen Inc. $80
$80 — —
Rocklatan
  • Alcon Vision LLC $67
$67 36 —
MIEBO
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $25
$25 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

188 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record