Product Program year 2023 Source: CMS Open Payments

rocklatan

Drug Glaucoma

NDC 70727-529-99

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,735,074

34,471 payments

Research payments

$373,202

46 payments

Through program year 2023, $4,735,074 in general payments and $373,202 in research payments were reported against rocklatan (Glaucoma).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2023 General $4,373 1
2022 General $888,693 8,758
2022 Research $373,202 46
2021 General $2,079,047 15,984
2020 General $1,762,961 9,728

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2020–2023
  1. Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $3,842,008 25,712 payments
  2. Alcon Vision LLC $893,066 8,759 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2023
  1. Robert Fechtner Ophthalmology · Newark, NJ $4,373 100% · 1 payment

Each share is of general payments naming this product in 2023.

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2023
  1. Ophthalmology $4,373 100% · 1 practitioner

Each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2023. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

Where the money went General payments · program year 2023
  1. New York $4,373 100% · 1 recipient

Each share is of general payments naming this product in 2023 where a state was reported.

Prescribed to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024

Part D claims

280,674

Prescriptions dispensed, refills included

Drug cost

$142,301,088

Paid at the pharmacy, in all

Prescribers

6,403

With 11 or more claims of it

Medicare Part D drugs matched to rocklatan, 2024
Part D drug Name match Relative to the largest Prescribers Claims Drug cost
Rocklatan Netarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost Same name 6,403 280,674 $142,301,088

Matched to this product by name; CMS does not link its files to Open Payments, so a similar name can be a different strength, form or brand. Prescriber counts include only prescribers with 11 or more claims of the drug, because CMS publishes nothing below that. Part D covers drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries at a pharmacy; it does not include drugs given in a clinic or hospital, or patients with other insurance.

Largest prescribers

First 5 of 100 by claims · 2024

Two separate records. Claims come from Medicare and related payments from Open Payments. They are shown in one row because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

The prescribers with the most Part D claims of this drug in 2024
Prescriber Specialty State Claims Drug cost Related payments
Kirk Sturridge Ophthalmology AL 986 $397,061 $176
Amy Miller Ophthalmology OH 841 $607,348 $14,674
Megan Rowlands Ophthalmology FL 837 $363,076 $16
Karina Esquenazi Ophthalmology FL 712 $274,571 None on record
Frank Moya Ophthalmology NC 703 $375,170 None on record

"No profile" means the prescriber has no Open Payments record here; "None on record" means no payment naming this product in the payment year. Related payments are general payments, and one that names several products is split evenly, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it. The list is the prescribers with the most claims, up to 100 per drug.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 100 with Patron
34,471 general · 46 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2023

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record