Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kuldev Singh

Ophthalmology Stanford, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1093852253 CMS profile 185990

300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,486,882

330 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Kuldev Singh of Stanford, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,486,882 across 330 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $130,684 35
2024 General $62,320 22
2023 General $237,803 43
2022 General $375,190 64
2021 General $211,183 36
2020 General $218,024 45
2019 General $251,677 85

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kuldev Singh
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kuldev Singh were reported at $130,684. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Kuldev Singh Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $251,677 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $218,024 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $211,183 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $375,190 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $237,803 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $62,320 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $130,684 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $323,042 37 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $312,006 32 payments
  3. Glaukos Corporation $281,420 36 payments
  4. Alcon Vision LLC $173,490 39 payments
  5. Sight Sciences, Inc. $145,580 72 payments
  6. Alcon Research LLC $70,526 27 payments
  7. Ivantis, Inc $67,320 17 payments
  8. Allergan Inc. $42,396 34 payments
  9. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $33,631 7 payments
  10. Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. $19,893 9 payments
  11. Other $17,578 20 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $983,632 154 payments
  2. Grant $177,278 13 payments
  3. Acquisitions $169,539 1 payment
  4. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $110,937 14 payments
  5. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $30,562 2 payments
  6. Food and Beverage $10,283 121 payments
  7. Travel and Lodging $4,652 25 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. HYDRUS Microstent Ophthalmology $185,415 18 payments
  2. iStent inject Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent System $157,882 16 payments
  3. iStent Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent System $157,656 13 payments
  4. OMNI SURGICAL SYSTEM $74,065 26 payments
  5. Syfovre $68,224 11 payments
  6. OMNI(R) SURGICAL SYSTEM (US) $40,921 28 payments
  7. Hydrus $40,145 11 payments
  8. SION SURGICAL INSTRUMENT $31,880 7 payments
  9. OMNI $29,687 15 payments
  10. Hydrus Microstent Ophthalmic Surgery $27,175 6 payments
  11. Other $89,806 90 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 11 drugs

Part D claims

383

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$37,298

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

25.6%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Rhopressa Netarsudil Mesylate Brand 14 $9,580
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 24 $8,916
Alphagan P Brimonidine Tartrate Brand 17 $7,285
Cyclosporine Generic 21 $3,673
Brinzolamide Generic 20 $3,047
Latanoprost Generic 142 $1,335
Brimonidine Tartrate Generic 15 $1,107
Dorzolamide-Timolol Dorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat Brand 43 $655
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 15 $635
Timolol Maleate Generic 39 $597

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 11 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 23 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$147,169

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

435

Average age 79

Services billed

1,819

236 women, 199 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 65%
Arthritis 33%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Diabetes 24%
Osteoporosis 23%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
Cancer 15%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

3 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Syfovre
  • Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $17,325
$17,325 — —
LUMIGAN
  • AbbVie, Inc. $122
$122 24 —
Rocklatan
  • Alcon Vision LLC $41
$41 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

330 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record