Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Nisha Joseph

Medical Oncology Atlanta, GA Medical Doctor

NPI 1285990309 CMS profile 4759641

69 Jesse Hill Jr Dr Se, Atlanta, GA 30303

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$50,342

65 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$1,663

Paid to them · 4 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,681,693 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2022–2025

Through program year 2025, Nisha Joseph of Atlanta, GA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $50,342 across 65 general payments and $1,663 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,681,693 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 83rd percentile of Medical Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $31,403 37
2024 General $13,422 13
2023 General $2,343 9
2023 Research $801 2
2022 General $157 3
2022 Research $862 2
2021 General $19 1
2020 General $2,925 1
2019 General $73 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Nisha Joseph
  • Medical Oncology median
  • Middle half of Medical Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Nisha Joseph were reported at $31,403. Among 3,316 Medical Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,128 and the middle half received between $147 and $5,675.

Show as a table
Year Nisha Joseph Medical Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $73 $968 $140–$6,658 $163
2020 $2,925 $747 $102–$5,891 $114
2021 $19 $430 $50–$4,098 $132
2022 $157 $812 $127–$4,907 $149
2023 $2,343 $957 $144–$5,248 $160
2024 $13,422 $1,042 $149–$5,650 $164
2025 $31,403 $1,128 $147–$5,675 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $21,649 31 payments
  2. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $8,738 3 payments
  3. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $7,855 5 payments
  4. Legend Biotech USA Inc. $5,600 9 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $2,925 1 payment
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,740 1 payment
  7. Pfizer Inc. $290 4 payments
  8. Celgene Corporation $151 3 payments
  9. AstraZeneca UK Limited $120 2 payments
  10. Genzyme Corporation $84 1 payment
  11. Other $190 5 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $45,996 18 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $2,258 38 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $2,004 8 payments
  4. Grant $84 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. DARZALEX Oncology $7,448 12 payments
  2. TECVAYLI Oncology $6,853 5 payments
  3. DARZALEX Oncology $4,586 3 payments
  4. BLENREP $2,925 1 payment
  5. TALVEY $2,608 6 payments
  6. CARVYKTI Oncology $2,501 6 payments
  7. CARVYKTI Oncology $2,300 1 payment
  8. TECVAYLI Oncology $1,830 2 payments
  9. ELREXFIO $290 4 payments
  10. Pomalyst $129 2 payments
  11. Other $236 5 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,663 4 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 12 drugs

Part D claims

719

Median for Medical Oncology: 414

Drug cost

$7,985,919

Median for Medical Oncology: $849,427

Branded share of claims

53.4%

Median for Medical Oncology: 28.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Lenalidomide Generic 223 $3,063,137
Pomalyst Pomalidomide Brand 103 $2,428,998
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 107 $1,784,100
Ninlaro Ixazomib Citrate Brand 52 $664,973
Zarxio Filgrastim-Sndz Brand 16 $37,112
Valacyclovir Valacyclovir Hcl Brand 106 $4,870
Colestipol Hcl Generic 12 $994
Acyclovir Generic 29 $891
Duloxetine Hcl Generic 14 $312
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 28 $304

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 12 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,431 Part D prescribers listed as Medical Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 13 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$17,124

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

131

Average age 72

Services billed

242

57 women, 74 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 42%
Chronic kidney disease 37%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Depression 23%
Atrial fibrillation 22%
Cancer 19%
Diabetes 18%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DARZALEX
  • Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $2,725
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $2,383
$5,108 — —
TECVAYLI
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $2,180
$2,180 — —
ELREXFIO
  • PFIZER INC. $102
$102 — —
TALVEY
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $40
$40 — —
CARVYKTI
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $22
$22 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

69 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Medical Oncology in Georgia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record