Manufacturer or GPO Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Legend Biotech USA Inc.

NJ, United States

CMS manufacturer 100001161893

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$648,261

5,618 payments

Research payments

$18,298

3 payments

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Legend Biotech USA Inc. reported paying $648,261 in general payments and $18,298 in research payments to U.S. physicians, teaching hospitals and other recipients.

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 General $295,797 3,865
2024 General $189,173 1,318
2023 General $144,675 360
2023 Research $18,298 3
2022 General $18,617 75

Breakdown

Top recipients General payments · program year 2025
  1. Doris Hansen Hematology · Tampa, FL $15,325 4 payments
  2. Kristen Hege Medical Oncology · San Francisco, CA $11,772 10 payments
  3. Maximilian Konig Rheumatology · Baltimore, MD $8,877 8 payments
  4. Robb Friedman Hematology & Oncology · Boston, MA $7,930 1 payment
  5. Surbhi Sidana Hematology · Stanford, CA $6,555 5 payments
  6. Muhamed Baljevic Hematology & Oncology · Nashville, TN $5,173 8 payments
  7. Peter Voorhees Hematology · Charlotte, NC $4,915 6 payments
  8. Ajai Chari Hematology & Oncology · New York, NY $4,537 4 payments
  9. Benjamin Derman Hematology & Oncology · Chicago, IL $4,286 4 payments
  10. Stephanie Jacobson Nurse Practitioner, Family · Augusta, GA $4,070 15 payments
Top research recipients Research payments · program year 2023
  1. Ut Md Anderson Cancer Center Teaching hospital · TX $18,298 3 payments
Products the payments named General payments · program year 2025
  1. Carvykti Oncology $232,253 100% · 2,480 recipients

Each share is of this company’s general payments naming a product in 2025. A payment can name up to five products, so these amounts overlap.

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Hematology & Oncology Internal Medicine $97,442 34% · 707 practitioners
  2. Hematology Internal Medicine $42,991 15% · 50 practitioners
  3. Medical Oncology Internal Medicine $41,390 14% · 244 practitioners
  4. Nurse Practitioner, Family Nurse Practitioner $26,137 9% · 412 practitioners
  5. Nurse Practitioner $18,220 6% · 280 practitioners

The top 5 of 65 specialties; each share is of this company’s general payments to practitioners with a specialty in 2025. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2025
  1. Florida $46,504 16% · 506 recipients
  2. California $38,108 13% · 234 recipients
  3. New York $23,536 8% · 96 recipients
  4. Georgia $18,143 6% · 183 recipients
  5. Massachusetts $17,628 6% · 33 recipients

The top 5 of 51 states; each share is of this company’s general payments in 2025 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $439,753 166 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $165,683 4,952 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $23,632 178 payments
  4. Grant $12,000 1 payment
  5. Education $5,693 320 payments
  6. Space rental or facility fees (teaching hospital only) $1,500 1 payment
5,618 general · 3 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers of drugs, devices and biologicals, and group purchasing organisations, are required to report the payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. This page shows what this company reported.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record