Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Nikita Shah

Hematology & Oncology Orlando, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1265417505 CMS profile 147595

22 W Underwood St, Orlando, FL 32806

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$470,297

519 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$4,425

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$219,580 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2021–2025

Through program year 2025, Nikita Shah of Orlando, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $470,297 across 519 general payments and $4,425 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $219,580 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $63,518 77
2024 General $74,260 84
2023 General $72,248 84
2022 General $76,547 69
2022 Research $4,425 1
2021 General $43,379 48
2020 General $80,021 86
2019 General $60,324 71

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Nikita Shah
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Nikita Shah were reported at $63,518. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Nikita Shah Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $60,324 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $80,021 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $43,379 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $76,547 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $72,248 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $74,260 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $63,518 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $196,042 148 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $108,675 175 payments
  3. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $105,863 109 payments
  4. Seattle Genetics, Inc. $31,229 31 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $9,038 7 payments
  6. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $7,124 10 payments
  7. Puma Biotechnology, Inc. $4,300 4 payments
  8. Athenex Pharmaceutical Division, LLC $2,175 5 payments
  9. Eisai Inc. $1,785 1 payment
  10. Hologic, LLC $1,722 7 payments
  11. Other $2,344 22 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $339,824 135 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $71,578 50 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $38,545 108 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $11,477 157 payments
  5. Long term medical supply or device loan $3,582 42 payments
  6. Honoraria $3,125 7 payments
  7. Gift $2,098 18 payments
  8. Education $68 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ENHERTU Oncology $93,117 99 payments
  2. KISQALI $88,550 146 payments
  3. LYNPARZA $63,032 46 payments
  4. ENHERTU Oncology $61,822 42 payments
  5. PIQRAY $59,276 54 payments
  6. TUKYSA $29,999 30 payments
  7. Datroway Oncology $12,196 9 payments
  8. DATROWAY Oncology $11,759 10 payments
  9. Trodelvy $7,112 9 payments
  10. IBRANCE $6,138 5 payments
  11. Other $14,627 61 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $4,425 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 21 drugs

Part D claims

1,597

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$2,831,472

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

19.6%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Kisqali Ribociclib Succinate Brand 89 $1,267,055
Ibrance Palbociclib Brand 67 $981,728
Kisqali Femara Co-Pack Ribociclib Succinate/Letrozole Brand 22 $295,092
Verzenio Abemaciclib Brand 12 $185,802
Lapatinib Lapatinib Ditosylate Brand 11 $55,581
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 26 $14,998
Anastrozole Generic 698 $12,994
Exemestane Generic 29 $5,897
Letrozole Generic 210 $5,323
Ondansetron Hcl Generic 60 $1,862

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 21 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 16 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$56,667

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

299

Average age 74

Services billed

685

265 women, 34 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Cancer 75%
High blood pressure 72%
Arthritis 40%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Diabetes 28%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Depression 22%
Osteoporosis 20%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 7 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ENHERTU
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $15,934
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $14,204
$30,138 — —
LYNPARZA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $13,859
$13,859 — —
Trodelvy
  • Gilead Sciences, Inc. $7,112
$7,112 — —
KISQALI
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $4,249
$4,249 111 —
Phesgo
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $27
$27 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 7 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

520 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record