Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Neal Moskowitz

Rheumatology Philadelphia, PA Medical Doctor

NPI 1083733349 CMS profile 139749

7908 Bustleton Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19152

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$14,491

703 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Neal Moskowitz of Philadelphia, PA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $14,491 across 703 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 78th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,436 147
2024 General $3,438 153
2023 General $2,370 124
2022 General $2,446 128
2021 General $860 43
2020 General $324 17
2019 General $1,615 91

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Neal Moskowitz
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Neal Moskowitz were reported at $3,436. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Neal Moskowitz Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,615 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $324 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $860 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $2,446 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $2,370 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $3,438 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $3,436 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $2,374 136 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,711 81 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $1,619 53 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $1,453 73 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $1,181 77 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $993 42 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $969 53 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $490 19 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $465 23 payments
  10. Genentech USA, Inc. $451 22 payments
  11. Other $2,784 124 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,321 697 payments
  2. Education $170 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $1,354 65 payments
  2. XELJANZ $1,125 73 payments
  3. SAPHNELO $969 41 payments
  4. RINVOQ $956 49 payments
  5. Otezla $902 52 payments
  6. Cimzia $900 31 payments
  7. Bimzelx $719 22 payments
  8. Prolia $621 43 payments
  9. EVENITY $547 39 payments
  10. ORENCIA $465 23 payments
  11. Other $8,670 418 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 35 drugs

Part D claims

2,737

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,617,603

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

32.3%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 44 $416,282
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 53 $385,563
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 13 $177,104
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 22 $121,825
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 18 $115,345
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 15 $110,558
Actemra Tocilizumab Brand 15 $69,828
Cimzia (2 Pack) Certolizumab Pegol Brand 11 $61,901
Otezla Apremilast Brand 12 $52,034
Teriparatide Generic 16 $33,614

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 35 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 40 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$974,456

Of which drugs: $859,013

Medicare patients

434

Average age 73

Services billed

72,741

316 women, 118 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 47%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Diabetes 26%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Depression 22%
COPD 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 23 5,370 $181,762
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 51 6,360 $158,605
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 39 14,430 $131,874
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 47 3,900 $78,297
Injection, tocilizumab, 1 mg J3262 Office 12 16,000 $75,054
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 12 8,400 $71,323
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 13 63 $321
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 18 621 $142
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 17 551 $57

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 32 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Cimzia
$390 11 —
TREMFYA
$381 — —
XELJANZ
$323 — —
SAPHNELO
$260 — —
RINVOQ
$228 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 32 with Patron

Records

703 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Pennsylvania

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record