Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Naveed Salahuddin

Rheumatology Hutchinson, KS Medical Doctor

NPI 1003860560 CMS profile 990064

2101 N Waldron St, Hutchinson, KS 67502

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,493

517 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Naveed Salahuddin of Hutchinson, KS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,493 across 517 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 69th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,021 105
2024 General $1,493 88
2023 General $1,861 113
2022 General $1,161 63
2021 General $344 22
2020 General $514 32
2019 General $1,100 94

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Naveed Salahuddin
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Naveed Salahuddin were reported at $2,021. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Naveed Salahuddin Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,100 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $514 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $344 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,161 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $1,861 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $1,493 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,021 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $1,673 99 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,335 71 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,203 78 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $943 62 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $498 33 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $456 30 payments
  7. Horizon Therapeutics plc $411 35 payments
  8. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $308 12 payments
  9. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $264 15 payments
  10. Genzyme Corporation $208 13 payments
  11. Other $1,194 69 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,069 511 payments
  2. Education $424 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $926 54 payments
  2. XELJANZ $913 60 payments
  3. TREMFYA $856 34 payments
  4. SIMPONI ARIA $528 38 payments
  5. BENLYSTA $498 33 payments
  6. EVENITY $478 29 payments
  7. STELARA $428 33 payments
  8. Otezla $361 21 payments
  9. Prolia $356 22 payments
  10. SIMPONI $341 24 payments
  11. Other $5,455 346 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 51 drugs

Part D claims

7,206

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$2,494,790

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

30.1%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Mini Etanercept Brand 66 $522,936
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 64 $521,781
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 50 $387,003
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 33 $247,519
Xeljanz Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 32 $175,773
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 24 $137,657
Cosentyx Sensoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 13 $98,707
Humira Adalimumab Brand 12 $81,738
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 11 $71,834
Cimzia (2 Pack) Certolizumab Pegol Brand 12 $70,689

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 51 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 71 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$378,226

Of which drugs: $19,969

Medicare patients

1,252

Average age 74

Services billed

70,755

854 women, 398 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Diabetes 31%
Depression 31%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Osteoporosis 23%
COPD 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 626 57,892 $5,772
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 131 1,152 $877
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 124 125 $730
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 20 mg J1020 Office 52 96 $419
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 92 100 $399

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 23 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $209
$209 — —
XELJANZ
  • PFIZER INC. $204
$204 56 —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $168
$168 — —
COSENTYX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $142
$142 13 —
Enbrel
  • Amgen Inc. $93
$93 130 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 23 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

517 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Kansas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record