Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Naila Ahmad

Rheumatology Easton, MD Medical Doctor

NPI 1366451619 CMS profile 16854

505 Dutchmans Ln Ste A3, Easton, MD 21601

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,084

758 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Naila Ahmad of Easton, MD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,084 across 758 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 78th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $477 23
2024 General $3,336 176
2023 General $3,172 149
2022 General $2,922 138
2021 General $2,087 115
2020 General $774 44
2019 General $2,316 113

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Naila Ahmad
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Naila Ahmad were reported at $477. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Naila Ahmad Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,316 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $774 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $2,087 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $2,922 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $3,172 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $3,336 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $477 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $3,016 154 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $2,617 144 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $1,216 75 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,070 40 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $814 35 payments
  6. UCB, Inc. $665 38 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $649 47 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $591 31 payments
  9. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $492 17 payments
  10. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $492 23 payments
  11. Other $3,462 154 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,540 747 payments
  2. Education $305 10 payments
  3. Grant $240 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $2,124 106 payments
  2. XELJANZ $1,076 63 payments
  3. EVENITY $927 46 payments
  4. TREMFYA $746 25 payments
  5. Prolia $695 49 payments
  6. SKYRIZI $634 26 payments
  7. TALTZ $607 38 payments
  8. BENLYSTA $591 31 payments
  9. Enbrel $586 38 payments
  10. Cimzia $573 31 payments
  11. Other $9,342 477 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 26 drugs

Part D claims

1,407

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,777,391

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

26.4%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Cortrophin Corticotropin Brand 12 $397,382
Gammagard Liquid Immun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga Ov50 Brand 36 $380,394
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 46 $341,031
Otezla Apremilast Brand 37 $191,888
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 22 $152,945
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 11 $147,788
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 19 $125,040
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 245 $12,294
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 189 $9,729
Leflunomide Generic 95 $5,822

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 26 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 56 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$2,982,386

Of which drugs: $2,836,950

Medicare patients

664

Average age 72

Services billed

111,731

473 women, 191 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 34%
Diabetes 28%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Depression 25%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
COPD 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, vedolizumab, 1 mg J3380 Office 17 15,600 $271,569
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 20 6,225 $210,907
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 49 8,040 $200,597
Injection, tocilizumab, 1 mg J3262 Office 21 35,840 $168,355
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 24 120 $456
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 42 1,628 $374
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, up to 40 mg J2920 Office 14 22 $72
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg J1200 Office 16 73 $47

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 36 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$465 22 —
TREMFYA
$240 11 —
SKYRIZI
$229 — —
LUPKYNIS
$219 — —
BENLYSTA
$166 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 36 with Patron

Records

758 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Maryland

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record