Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mohammed Siddiqui

Rheumatology Elizabethtown, KY Medical Doctor

NPI 1831171347 CMS profile 219263

1107 Woodland Dr, Suite 105, Elizabethtown, KY 42701

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,528

222 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Mohammed Siddiqui of Elizabethtown, KY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,528 across 222 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 55th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $270 13
2024 General $664 38
2023 General $717 42
2022 General $571 34
2021 General $453 31
2020 General $400 28
2019 General $453 36

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mohammed Siddiqui
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mohammed Siddiqui were reported at $270. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Mohammed Siddiqui Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $453 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $400 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $453 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $571 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $717 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $664 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $270 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $1,225 81 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,126 77 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $185 10 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $147 9 payments
  5. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $140 4 payments
  6. UCB, Inc. $136 9 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $111 6 payments
  8. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $109 6 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $94 5 payments
  10. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $84 5 payments
  11. Other $173 10 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,434 219 payments
  2. Education $94 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $868 59 payments
  2. Otezla $587 36 payments
  3. Enbrel Inflammation $515 30 payments
  4. Enbrel Inflammation $291 20 payments
  5. HUMIRA $239 17 payments
  6. BENLYSTA $185 10 payments
  7. Prolia $150 12 payments
  8. XELJANZ $147 9 payments
  9. Enbrel Inflammation $138 12 payments
  10. Cimzia $136 9 payments
  11. Other $1,128 61 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 30 drugs

Part D claims

1,463

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,843,442

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

46.1%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 68 $517,832
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 54 $343,433
Simponi Golimumab Brand 37 $218,184
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 25 $159,653
Enbrel Mini Etanercept Brand 20 $146,180
Gammagard Liquid Immun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga Ov50 Brand 21 $106,480
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 12 $87,482
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 12 $66,977
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 11 $62,602
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 12 $62,342

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 30 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 10 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$45,773

Of which drugs: $22

Medicare patients

208

Average age 71

Services billed

851

151 women, 57 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Diabetes 38%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
COPD 24%
Depression 24%
Osteoporosis 23%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 18 23 $17

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 15 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $161
$161 54 —
Enbrel
  • Amgen Inc. $130
$130 100 —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $75
$75 12 —
BENLYSTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $56
$56 — —
HYRIMOZ
  • Sandoz Inc. $44
$44 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 15 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

222 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record