Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Meredith Berger

Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Midlothian, VA Medical Doctor

NPI 1831181734 CMS profile 173590

348 Brown's Hill Ct, Midlothian, VA 23114

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$31,600

765 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Meredith Berger of Midlothian, VA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $31,600 across 765 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 88th percentile of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,099 97
2024 General $2,709 125
2023 General $2,276 120
2022 General $2,544 132
2021 General $1,717 108
2020 General $1,835 63
2019 General $18,419 120

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Meredith Berger
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median
  • Middle half of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Meredith Berger were reported at $2,099. Among 5,868 Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles paid that year, the median was $507 and the middle half received between $135 and $1,838.

Show as a table
Year Meredith Berger Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median Middle half National median
2019 $18,419 $494 $123–$2,253 $163
2020 $1,835 $335 $85–$1,841 $114
2021 $1,717 $398 $88–$1,981 $132
2022 $2,544 $364 $88–$1,568 $149
2023 $2,276 $420 $113–$1,614 $160
2024 $2,709 $440 $121–$1,646 $164
2025 $2,099 $507 $135–$1,838 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $17,985 52 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $1,575 84 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $1,276 58 payments
  4. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,154 81 payments
  5. Abbott Laboratories $812 51 payments
  6. Insulet Corporation $720 20 payments
  7. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC $576 37 payments
  8. Radius Health, Inc. $530 19 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $453 22 payments
  10. IBSA Pharma Inc. $449 21 payments
  11. Other $6,070 320 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $16,874 13 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $14,664 748 payments
  3. Education $63 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SOLIQUA 100/33 $12,688 16 payments
  2. TOUJEO Diabetes $3,988 10 payments
  3. Ozempic $855 60 payments
  4. EVENITY $741 34 payments
  5. TOUJEO Endocrinology $734 1 payment
  6. RYBELSUS $707 50 payments
  7. JARDIANCE $703 38 payments
  8. Omnipod $701 19 payments
  9. UNITHROID $576 37 payments
  10. Prolia $531 28 payments
  11. Other $12,585 664 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 90 drugs

Part D claims

5,751

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$848,600

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

42.7%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 63 $107,635
Somatuline Depot Lanreotide Acetate Brand 13 $105,347
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 86 $101,333
Synthroid Levothyroxine Sodium Brand 890 $59,004
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 38 $58,410
Toujeo Max Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 42 $56,948
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 37 $46,164
Toujeo Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 41 $30,529
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 14 $27,045
Humalog Kwikpen U-100 Insulin Lispro Brand 50 $23,921

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 90 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 18 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$256,953

Of which drugs: $87,420

Medicare patients

710

Average age 75

Services billed

6,941

584 women, 126 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 68%
Arthritis 45%
Osteoporosis 41%
Diabetes 35%
Depression 21%
Ischemic heart disease 19%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
Cancer 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 44 4,260 $87,420

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 38 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
$226 86 —
TZIELD
$198 — —
Tymlos
$113 — —
RECORLEV
$110 — —
MOUNJARO
$95 38 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 38 with Patron

Records

765 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism in Virginia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record