Product Program year 2019 Source: CMS Open Payments

Soliqua 100/33

Drug Diabetes

NDC 0024-5761-05

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,135,973

35,083 payments

Research payments

$1,230,642

202 payments

Through program year 2019, $4,135,973 in general payments and $1,230,642 in research payments were reported against Soliqua 100/33 (Diabetes).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2019 General $4,135,973 35,083
2019 Research $1,230,642 202

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $4,120,693 34,902 payments
  2. Genzyme Corporation $15,280 181 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2019
  1. Juan Frias Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism · San Diego, CA $184,245 4% · 108 payments
  2. Vivian Fonseca Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism · New Orleans, LA $92,728 2% · 32 payments
  3. Martin Stevens Ann Arbor, MI $60,117 1% · 75 payments
  4. Bruce Bode Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism · Atlanta, GA $57,202 1% · 61 payments
  5. Daniel MacIas Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism · Huntington, WV $56,798 1% · 73 payments

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Internal Medicine $2,889,816 74% · 1,876 practitioners
  2. Internal Medicine $489,936 13% · 4,318 practitioners
  3. Family Medicine $290,172 7% · 5,749 practitioners
  4. Emergency Medicine $40,434 1% · 27 practitioners
  5. Allergy & Immunology $38,388 <1% · 4 practitioners

The top 5 of 77 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2019. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2019
  1. California $646,720 16% · 1,009 recipients
  2. Texas $438,769 11% · 1,282 recipients
  3. Louisiana $239,718 6% · 352 recipients
  4. New York $236,890 6% · 662 recipients
  5. Florida $217,157 5% · 1,000 recipients

The top 5 of 52 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

Prescribed to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024

Part D claims

189,307

Prescriptions dispensed, refills included

Drug cost

$202,666,012

Paid at the pharmacy, in all

Prescribers

6,568

With 11 or more claims of it

Medicare Part D drugs matched to SOLIQUA 100/33, 2024
Part D drug Name match Relative to the largest Prescribers Claims Drug cost
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Same name 6,568 189,307 $202,666,012

Matched to this product by name; CMS does not link its files to Open Payments, so a similar name can be a different strength, form or brand. Prescriber counts include only prescribers with 11 or more claims of the drug, because CMS publishes nothing below that. Part D covers drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries at a pharmacy; it does not include drugs given in a clinic or hospital, or patients with other insurance.

Largest prescribers

First 5 of 100 by claims · 2024

Two separate records. Claims come from Medicare and related payments from Open Payments. They are shown in one row because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

The prescribers with the most Part D claims of this drug in 2024
Prescriber Specialty State Claims Drug cost Related payments
Stephan Kowalyk Endocrinology PA 1,020 $1,063,514 None on record
Marcelo Bendix Internal Medicine FL 669 $731,188 None on record
Kelly Roberts Physician Assistant NV 621 $665,436 None on record
Tom Thomas Endocrinology TX 480 $502,826 None on record
Mark Johnson Endocrinology IA 475 $434,923 None on record

"No profile" means the prescriber has no Open Payments record here; "None on record" means no payment naming this product in the payment year. Related payments are general payments, and one that names several products is split evenly, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it. The list is the prescribers with the most claims, up to 100 per drug.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 100 with Patron
35,083 general · 202 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2019

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record