Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mark Johnson

Internal Medicine Mason City, IA Medical Doctor

NPI 1013923127 CMS profile 46454

910 N Eisenhower Ave, Mason City, IA 50401

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$222,961

433 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Mark Johnson of Mason City, IA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $222,961 across 433 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $28,199 35
2024 General $16,974 47
2023 General $10,297 34
2022 General $54,846 61
2021 General $38,629 77
2020 General $24,823 42
2019 General $49,192 137

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mark Johnson
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mark Johnson were reported at $28,199. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Mark Johnson Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $49,192 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $24,823 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $38,629 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $54,846 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $10,297 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $16,974 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $28,199 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $108,856 129 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $24,246 47 payments
  3. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $23,493 47 payments
  4. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $17,826 23 payments
  5. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $16,057 43 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $15,235 30 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $11,912 33 payments
  8. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $3,225 6 payments
  9. Medtronic, Inc. $1,160 17 payments
  10. Abbott Laboratories $281 14 payments
  11. Other $670 44 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $201,350 143 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $11,389 76 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $7,187 204 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $2,856 3 payments
  5. Education $178 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RYBELSUS $50,280 45 payments
  2. Ozempic $47,754 57 payments
  3. FARXIGA $24,216 45 payments
  4. NURTEC ODT $19,282 49 payments
  5. SOLIQUA 100/33 $18,966 25 payments
  6. Kerendia $17,826 23 payments
  7. JARDIANCE Diabetes $11,820 26 payments
  8. JARDIANCE Diabetes $7,810 16 payments
  9. Tresiba $7,744 13 payments
  10. JARDIANCE Diabetes $7,425 14 payments
  11. Other $6,957 123 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 93 drugs

Part D claims

9,572

Median for Endocrinology: 1,959

Drug cost

$4,969,953

Median for Endocrinology: $890,201

Branded share of claims

79.2%

Median for Endocrinology: 57%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 1,205 $1,336,999
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 749 $624,968
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 381 $441,181
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 475 $434,923
Synjardy Xr Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 344 $289,395
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 240 $261,665
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 319 $251,072
Fiasp Flextouch Insulin Aspart (Niacinamide) Brand 183 $172,064
Novolog Flexpen Insulin Aspart Brand 492 $106,420
Humalog Kwikpen U-200 Insulin Lispro Brand 71 $98,179

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 93 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 6,527 Part D prescribers listed as Endocrinology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 12 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$106,099

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

1,561

Average age 77

Services billed

3,877

819 women, 742 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 55%
Arthritis 51%
Ischemic heart disease 46%
Chronic kidney disease 43%
Heart failure 41%
Depression 34%
Atrial fibrillation 32%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
  • Lilly USA, LLC $5,399
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $4,650
$10,049 749 —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $6,069
$6,069 1,205 —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $18
$18 12 —
TZIELD
  • SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC $14
$14 — —
ZEPBOUND
  • Lilly USA, LLC $13
$13 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

433 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Iowa

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record