Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Megan Eshbaugh

Rheumatology Suffolk, VA Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1710137096 CMS profile 77081

1033 Champions Way Ste 100, Suffolk, VA 23435

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$17,097

942 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Megan Eshbaugh of Suffolk, VA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $17,097 across 942 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 80th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,005 160
2024 General $2,971 137
2023 General $2,795 132
2022 General $2,081 113
2021 General $1,797 105
2020 General $1,547 101
2019 General $2,902 194

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Megan Eshbaugh
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Megan Eshbaugh were reported at $3,005. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Megan Eshbaugh Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,902 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $1,547 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $1,797 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $2,081 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $2,795 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $2,971 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $3,005 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $3,721 175 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,307 138 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,504 84 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $1,431 112 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $1,208 80 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,095 48 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $913 50 payments
  8. Radius Health, Inc. $781 39 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $532 33 payments
  10. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $476 23 payments
  11. Other $3,129 160 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $16,967 938 payments
  2. Education $130 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Otezla $1,460 69 payments
  2. RINVOQ $1,332 80 payments
  3. XELJANZ $1,287 104 payments
  4. Enbrel Inflammation $1,125 49 payments
  5. Prolia $1,094 58 payments
  6. EVENITY $1,043 57 payments
  7. TREMFYA $1,036 58 payments
  8. Cimzia $953 52 payments
  9. ORENCIA $936 51 payments
  10. Enbrel Inflammation $616 28 payments
  11. Other $9,922 524 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 21 drugs

Part D claims

1,001

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$435,095

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

18.5%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 22 $162,773
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 21 $146,752
Simponi Golimumab Brand 12 $83,728
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 334 $13,139
Colchicine Generic 54 $7,000
Leflunomide Generic 45 $5,823
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 110 $4,670
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 18 $1,776
Cevimeline Hcl Generic 12 $1,393
Sulfasalazine Dr Sulfasalazine Brand 20 $1,211

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 21 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 56 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,164,033

Of which drugs: $1,029,426

Medicare patients

515

Average age 74

Services billed

59,170

399 women, 116 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 74%
Osteoporosis 44%
Diabetes 26%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
Depression 18%
COPD 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 53 20,075 $678,208
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 66 5,280 $107,760
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 13 4,200 $34,203
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 21 21 $1,404
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 51 255 $1,159
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 14 580 $59
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 51 51 $24

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
COSENTYX
$299 — —
Enbrel
$296 21 —
RINVOQ
$253 — —
XELJANZ
$234 — —
SKYRIZI
$191 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

942 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Virginia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record