Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Maya Estephan

Internal Medicine Wichita, KS Medical Doctor

NPI 1851687313 CMS profile 558275

1921 N Webb Rd, Wichita, KS 67206

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,143

722 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Maya Estephan of Wichita, KS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,143 across 722 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,066 159
2024 General $2,542 146
2023 General $1,378 74
2022 General $1,831 114
2021 General $1,422 89
2020 General $498 27
2019 General $1,407 113

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Maya Estephan
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Maya Estephan were reported at $3,066. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Maya Estephan Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,407 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $498 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,422 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,831 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,378 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,542 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $3,066 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $2,374 132 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,207 143 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $1,284 108 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,009 53 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $680 42 payments
  6. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $483 22 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $472 25 payments
  8. UCB, Inc. $441 25 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $414 27 payments
  10. ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $311 15 payments
  11. Other $2,467 130 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,000 719 payments
  2. Education $143 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $1,552 97 payments
  2. XELJANZ $1,069 88 payments
  3. SIMPONI ARIA $714 37 payments
  4. Otezla $557 37 payments
  5. EVENITY $512 27 payments
  6. ACTHAR $483 22 payments
  7. SAPHNELO $472 25 payments
  8. Enbrel $458 23 payments
  9. Prolia $421 27 payments
  10. BENLYSTA $401 26 payments
  11. Other $8,046 483 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 36 drugs

Part D claims

2,864

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$567,326

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

24.1%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 23 $167,708
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 23 $155,637
Otezla Apremilast Brand 16 $86,901
Actemra Tocilizumab Brand 19 $45,422
Actemra Actpen Tocilizumab Brand 15 $38,690
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 515 $13,916
Savella Milnacipran Hcl Brand 24 $13,804
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 496 $7,532
Mycophenolate Mofetil Generic 43 $7,414
Pregabalin Generic 146 $4,041

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 36 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 89 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$935,613

Of which drugs: $829,510

Medicare patients

482

Average age 72

Services billed

77,079

386 women, 96 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 72%
Osteoporosis 37%
Depression 29%
Diabetes 24%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
COPD 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 17 5,075 $171,939
Injection, rituximab, 10 mg J9312 Office 12 2,350 $144,183
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 27 14,163 $128,482
Injection, tocilizumab, 1 mg J3262 Office 13 26,040 $122,745
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 60 4,740 $97,091
Injection, hydrocortisone sodium succinate, up to 100 mg J1720 Office 18 36 $533
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 12 1,240 $130

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 39 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XELJANZ
  • PFIZER INC. $253
$253 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $245
$245 — —
ACTHAR
  • Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $160
$160 — —
TAVNEOS
  • Amgen Inc. $148
$148 — —
KRYSTEXXA
  • Amgen Inc. $131
$131 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 39 with Patron

Records

722 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Kansas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record