Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2020–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mark Freijat

Rheumatology Scottsdale, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1124337621 CMS profile 232868

7425 E Shea Blvd Ste 100, Scottsdale, AZ 85260

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,647

445 records reported · program years 2020–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2020–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Mark Freijat of Scottsdale, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,647 across 445 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 71st percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,342 112
2024 General $2,486 117
2023 General $1,921 96
2022 General $1,112 62
2021 General $1,762 57
2020 General $22 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mark Freijat
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mark Freijat were reported at $2,342. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Mark Freijat Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $22 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $1,762 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,112 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $1,921 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $2,486 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,342 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $2,263 102 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $932 45 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $868 46 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $864 48 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $635 27 payments
  6. Horizon Therapeutics plc $466 26 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $449 26 payments
  8. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $437 19 payments
  9. Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. $410 6 payments
  10. Sobi, Inc $356 18 payments
  11. Other $1,967 82 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,391 440 payments
  2. Education $256 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. BENLYSTA $864 48 payments
  2. RINVOQ $687 36 payments
  3. TREMFYA $652 36 payments
  4. Enbrel Inflammation $529 32 payments
  5. TAVNEOS $517 22 payments
  6. Otezla $466 28 payments
  7. KRYSTEXXA $466 26 payments
  8. Enbrel Inflammation $465 17 payments
  9. SIMPONI ARIA $458 24 payments
  10. XELJANZ $449 26 payments
  11. Other $5,527 236 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 31 drugs

Part D claims

1,527

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$940,815

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

29.4%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Gammaked Immune Globul G/Gly/Iga Avg 46 Brand 12 $233,395
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 14 $191,262
Humira(Cf) Adalimumab Brand 15 $120,869
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 13 $104,753
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 11 $90,893
Orencia Abatacept/Maltose Brand 13 $86,250
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 11 $74,048
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 324 $8,566
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 154 $7,512
Leflunomide Generic 72 $5,230

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 31 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 34 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$468,813

Of which drugs: $241,083

Medicare patients

640

Average age 75

Services billed

32,073

464 women, 176 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 70%
Osteoporosis 38%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Diabetes 20%
Depression 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 13 2,901 $98,844
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 12 7,560 $66,272
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 11 17,200 $62,240
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 34 1,564 $148

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 27 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KRYSTEXXA
  • Amgen Inc. $234
$234 — —
BENLYSTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $207
$207 — —
XELJANZ
  • PFIZER INC. $178
$178 — —
Enbrel
  • Amgen Inc. $153
$153 14 —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $137
$137 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 27 with Patron

Records

445 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record