Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Louis Perdue

Rheumatology Metairie, LA Medical Doctor

NPI 1184838716 CMS profile 539290

4315 Houma Blvd, Suite 303, Metairie, LA 70006

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$16,919

860 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Louis Perdue of Metairie, LA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,919 across 860 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 80th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,254 115
2024 General $2,733 141
2023 General $2,547 133
2022 General $2,609 127
2021 General $1,620 108
2020 General $1,820 105
2019 General $3,336 131

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Louis Perdue
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Louis Perdue were reported at $2,254. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Louis Perdue Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $3,336 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $1,820 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $1,620 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $2,609 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $2,547 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $2,733 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,254 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $3,584 125 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $2,962 154 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $1,161 74 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,030 51 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $950 64 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $782 45 payments
  7. Horizon Therapeutics plc $648 48 payments
  8. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $623 28 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $599 36 payments
  10. Radius Health, Inc. $432 21 payments
  11. Other $4,148 214 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,517 852 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $1,250 1 payment
  3. Education $152 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. HUMIRA $1,571 23 payments
  2. RINVOQ $1,544 82 payments
  3. Prolia $957 55 payments
  4. Cimzia $830 57 payments
  5. EVENITY $793 45 payments
  6. ACTHAR $623 28 payments
  7. TALTZ $597 35 payments
  8. Otezla $570 30 payments
  9. TREMFYA $541 29 payments
  10. XELJANZ $537 41 payments
  11. Other $10,896 599 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 63 drugs

Part D claims

7,168

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,729,325

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

13.1%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 60 $454,221
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 38 $309,827
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 23 $241,361
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 21 $128,746
Prolia Denosumab Brand 63 $110,003
Enbrel Mini Etanercept Brand 12 $90,753
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 14 $79,656
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 11 $71,703
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 12 $56,948
Actemra Tocilizumab Brand 13 $34,734

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 63 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 39 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$945,567

Of which drugs: $798,824

Medicare patients

478

Average age 75

Services billed

85,288

343 women, 135 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 35%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Depression 22%
Diabetes 21%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 22 21,000 $182,960
Injection, tocilizumab, 1 mg J3262 Office 11 28,280 $132,695
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 34 3,360 $67,535
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 46 2,386 $241
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 16 34 $146
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 12 202 $45

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 37 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $370
$370 60 —
ACTHAR
  • Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $141
$141 — —
KRYSTEXXA
  • Amgen Inc. $137
$137 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $136
$136 — —
TAVNEOS
  • Amgen Inc. $129
$129 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 37 with Patron

Records

860 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record