Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Linnea Chap

Hematology & Oncology Beverly Hills, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1700839362 CMS profile 77578

8900 Wilshire Blvd, Beverly Hills, CA 90211

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$706,889

1,450 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$8,233

Paid to them · 6 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$5,279,594 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Linnea Chap of Beverly Hills, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $706,889 across 1,450 general payments and $8,233 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $5,279,594 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

11 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $85,178 222
2024 General $163,655 227
2023 General $168,561 233
2023 Research $300 1
2022 General $117,610 241
2022 Research $450 1
2021 General $55,330 139
2020 General $30,447 82
2020 Research $1,068 2
2019 General $86,108 306
2019 Research $6,415 2

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Linnea Chap
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Linnea Chap were reported at $85,178. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Linnea Chap Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $86,108 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $30,447 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $55,330 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $117,610 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $168,561 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $163,655 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $85,178 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $230,777 263 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $170,402 253 payments
  3. Seattle Genetics, Inc. $99,996 82 payments
  4. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $68,977 83 payments
  5. Genentech USA, Inc. $40,611 93 payments
  6. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $33,071 78 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $26,183 71 payments
  8. Stemline Therapeutics Inc. $6,665 14 payments
  9. Pfizer International LLC $4,644 4 payments
  10. Eli Lilly and Company $3,125 2 payments
  11. Other $22,437 507 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $461,804 130 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $102,850 260 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $102,385 43 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $33,541 990 payments
  5. Honoraria $4,800 4 payments
  6. Long term medical supply or device loan $1,196 12 payments
  7. Education $314 11 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. IBRANCE $173,752 197 payments
  2. TUKYSA $109,235 90 payments
  3. ENHERTU Oncology $101,287 114 payments
  4. Trodelvy $67,226 72 payments
  5. ENHERTU Oncology $27,837 67 payments
  6. Kadcyla $21,552 26 payments
  7. TALZENNA $18,475 54 payments
  8. TECENTRIQ $18,219 32 payments
  9. Herceptin $17,786 16 payments
  10. PIQRAY $15,114 15 payments
  11. Other $71,808 858 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $8,233 6 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 25 drugs

Part D claims

839

Median for Medical Oncology: 414

Drug cost

$1,370,205

Median for Medical Oncology: $849,427

Branded share of claims

17.6%

Median for Medical Oncology: 28.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Kisqali Ribociclib Succinate Brand 39 $583,600
Lynparza Olaparib Brand 11 $187,101
Phesgo Pertuzumab-Trastuzumab-Hy-Zzxf Brand 16 $131,993
Enhertu Fam-Trastuzumab Deruxtecn-Nxki Brand 11 $129,809
Lapatinib Lapatinib Ditosylate Brand 15 $75,810
Neulasta Onpro Pegfilgrastim Brand 11 $69,405
Everolimus Generic 13 $68,170
Xgeva Denosumab Brand 17 $55,167
Prolia Denosumab Brand 28 $43,214
Exemestane Generic 89 $15,361

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 25 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,431 Part D prescribers listed as Medical Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 71 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$491,925

Of which drugs: $411,439

Medicare patients

191

Average age 71

Services billed

29,799

191 women, 0 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Cancer 75%
High blood pressure 66%
Osteoporosis 51%
Arthritis 46%
Diabetes 27%
Ischemic heart disease 20%
Depression 18%
COPD 9%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 32 4,860 $90,740

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 38 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
IBRANCE
$35,590 — —
ENHERTU
$27,953 11 —
Trodelvy
$24,130 — —
LYNPARZA
$5,792 11 —
Truqap
$3,760 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 38 with Patron

Records

1,456 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record