Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Lindsay Kelmenson

Rheumatology Hoover, AL Medical Doctor

NPI 1457647935 CMS profile 1173265

5356 Stadium Trace Pkwy Ste 200, Hoover, AL 35244

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$18,915

1,015 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Lindsay Kelmenson of Hoover, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $18,915 across 1,015 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 82nd percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,039 162
2024 General $3,539 179
2023 General $3,460 157
2022 General $2,543 130
2021 General $2,820 169
2020 General $1,612 92
2019 General $1,901 126

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Lindsay Kelmenson
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Lindsay Kelmenson were reported at $3,039. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Lindsay Kelmenson Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,901 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $1,612 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $2,820 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $2,543 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $3,460 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $3,539 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $3,039 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $4,042 182 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $2,644 157 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $1,792 116 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,692 77 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $1,405 88 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,112 62 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $892 49 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $662 38 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $532 27 payments
  10. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $503 27 payments
  11. Other $3,640 192 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $18,368 1,011 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $500 1 payment
  3. Education $47 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $2,649 112 payments
  2. XELJANZ $1,659 108 payments
  3. TREMFYA $1,028 49 payments
  4. Cimzia $1,018 66 payments
  5. SIMPONI ARIA $942 44 payments
  6. TALTZ $859 47 payments
  7. Prolia $782 45 payments
  8. Otezla $722 48 payments
  9. EVENITY $715 42 payments
  10. HUMIRA $710 41 payments
  11. Other $11,298 589 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 32 drugs

Part D claims

2,102

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$463,244

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

12.5%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 19 $117,738
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 14 $113,680
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 13 $94,619
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 14 $75,142
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 606 $32,589
Leflunomide Generic 84 $7,391
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 174 $6,307
Celecoxib Generic 104 $3,302
Duloxetine Hcl Generic 106 $1,648
Pilocarpine Hcl Generic 22 $1,606

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 32 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 38 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$860,424

Of which drugs: $792,608

Medicare patients

196

Average age 71

Services billed

59,263

164 women, 32 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 38%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Depression 21%
Diabetes 20%
Cancer 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 19 10,700 $359,275
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 47 5,040 $100,809
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 18 675 $153
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 21 1,210 $115

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 34 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$371 — —
SKYRIZI
$332 — —
TREMFYA
$228 — —
TALTZ
$224 14 —
XELJANZ
$213 19 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 34 with Patron

Records

1,015 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record