Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Leah Triplett

Rheumatology Charleston, WV Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1679500532 CMS profile 257776

1120 Kanawha Blvd E Ste 200, Charleston, WV 25301

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$19,106

990 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Leah Triplett of Charleston, WV is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $19,106 across 990 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 82nd percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,796 122
2024 General $2,856 130
2023 General $3,709 155
2022 General $2,460 132
2021 General $2,130 119
2020 General $2,169 131
2019 General $2,986 201

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Leah Triplett
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Leah Triplett were reported at $2,796. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Leah Triplett Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,986 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $2,169 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $2,130 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $2,460 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $3,709 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $2,856 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,796 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $3,388 199 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,602 106 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $1,238 80 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,158 51 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,135 36 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $893 43 payments
  7. Horizon Therapeutics plc $785 31 payments
  8. UCB, Inc. $766 42 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $766 51 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $699 41 payments
  11. Other $5,676 310 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $18,896 983 payments
  2. Education $210 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $1,395 49 payments
  2. Otezla $1,079 60 payments
  3. SAPHNELO $996 27 payments
  4. XELJANZ $988 58 payments
  5. EVENITY $842 48 payments
  6. Prolia $813 57 payments
  7. KRYSTEXXA $729 28 payments
  8. SIMPONI ARIA $646 31 payments
  9. TREMFYA $622 20 payments
  10. BENLYSTA $600 25 payments
  11. Other $15,632 912 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 50 drugs

Part D claims

3,643

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$2,751,700

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

22.5%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 83 $800,211
Enbrel Mini Etanercept Brand 39 $293,969
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 45 $252,188
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 24 $178,630
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 12 $167,138
Cosentyx Unoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 19 $160,652
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 21 $132,201
Otezla Apremilast Brand 25 $119,629
Xeljanz Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 20 $101,659
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 14 $101,599

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 50 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 51 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,468,281

Of which drugs: $1,355,901

Medicare patients

508

Average age 72

Services billed

56,201

409 women, 99 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Depression 35%
Osteoporosis 32%
Chronic kidney disease 31%
Diabetes 28%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
COPD 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 11 7,350 $230,545
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 68 6,060 $123,047
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 15 12,429 $111,257
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 20 20 $1,627
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 44 2,430 $240
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 20 mg J1020 Office 12 15 $62

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 48 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
SKYRIZI
$219 — —
XELJANZ
$202 35 —
TREMFYA
$184 12 —
KRYSTEXXA
$169 — —
BENLYSTA
$152 18 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 48 with Patron

Records

990 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in West Virginia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record