Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Laura Minto

Neurology Mobile, AL Medical Doctor

NPI 1386791259 CMS profile 198478

1601 Center Street, Ste. 2S, Mobile, AL 36604

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$32,699

667 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$59,741 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2021

Through program year 2025, Laura Minto of Mobile, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $32,699 across 667 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $59,741 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $10,389 169
2024 General $3,390 171
2023 General $2,605 151
2022 General $1,676 95
2021 General $331 19
2020 General $258 17
2019 General $14,050 45

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Laura Minto
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Laura Minto were reported at $10,389. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Laura Minto Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $14,050 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $258 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $331 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $1,676 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $2,605 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $3,390 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $10,389 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Genentech USA, Inc. $14,102 53 payments
  2. EMD Serono, Inc. $8,284 44 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $2,004 142 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,308 70 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $719 47 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $603 33 payments
  7. Eisai Inc. $518 28 payments
  8. SK Life Science, Inc. $494 19 payments
  9. Lundbeck LLC $457 24 payments
  10. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc $449 24 payments
  11. Other $3,763 183 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,011 657 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $10,622 4 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $7,200 1 payment
  4. Travel and Lodging $2,773 3 payments
  5. Education $92 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. OCREVUS $13,968 45 payments
  2. Mavenclad $7,200 1 payment
  3. QULIPTA $1,180 84 payments
  4. KESIMPTA $762 46 payments
  5. NURTEC ODT $703 46 payments
  6. UBRELVY $690 48 payments
  7. ZAVZPRET $595 40 payments
  8. Leqembi $524 28 payments
  9. BOTOX $481 33 payments
  10. NUPLAZID $449 24 payments
  11. Other $6,978 360 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 45 drugs

Part D claims

2,489

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$296,343

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

16.1%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Tecfidera Dimethyl Fumarate Brand 12 $111,940
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 23 $37,679
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 39 $34,848
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 27 $19,660
Rexulti Brexpiprazole Brand 11 $15,766
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 17 $13,649
Emgality Syringe Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 20 $13,591
Memantine Hcl Generic 340 $8,223
Tiagabine Hcl Generic 12 $7,409
Rivastigmine Generic 27 $4,820

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 45 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 12 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$67,019

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

317

Average age 76

Services billed

1,846

190 women, 127 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 59%
Ischemic heart disease 43%
Depression 34%
Chronic kidney disease 31%
Diabetes 29%
Atrial fibrillation 26%
Alzheimer's or dementia 26%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 30 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
QULIPTA
$287 — —
KESIMPTA
$242 — —
Leqembi
$216 — —
VYEPTI
$199 — —
OCREVUS
$189 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 30 with Patron

Records

667 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Alabama

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record