Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Hayden Long

Neurology Mobile, AL Medical Doctor

NPI 1700093598 CMS profile 1237293

101 Memorial Hospital Dr, Suite 200, Mobile, AL 36608

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$386,169

1,971 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Hayden Long of Mobile, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $386,169 across 1,971 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $99,314 323
2024 General $86,618 350
2023 General $38,627 264
2022 General $67,850 329
2021 General $79,748 365
2020 General $11,383 155
2019 General $2,629 185

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Hayden Long
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Hayden Long were reported at $99,314. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Hayden Long Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,629 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $11,383 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $79,748 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $67,850 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $38,627 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $86,618 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $99,314 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $230,127 564 payments
  2. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $74,032 168 payments
  3. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $52,822 117 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $7,180 171 payments
  5. Allergan Inc. $4,901 34 payments
  6. SK Life Science, Inc. $1,926 79 payments
  7. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,547 78 payments
  8. Lundbeck LLC $1,089 53 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $1,072 57 payments
  10. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc $1,049 66 payments
  11. Other $10,425 584 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $327,017 147 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $31,994 1,632 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $23,542 184 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $3,420 1 payment
  5. Education $196 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. QULIPTA $180,458 368 payments
  2. UBRELVY Neuroscience $134,160 329 payments
  3. NURTEC ODT Primary Care $126,855 285 payments
  4. UBRELVY Neuroscience $3,679 27 payments
  5. AIMOVIG $1,040 56 payments
  6. ULTOMIRIS $965 39 payments
  7. VYEPTI $799 36 payments
  8. Briviact $733 42 payments
  9. NURTEC ODT Pain $688 59 payments
  10. EMGALITY $619 41 payments
  11. Other $15,393 895 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 71 drugs

Part D claims

4,458

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$1,103,003

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

33.2%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 95 $141,344
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 82 $132,996
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 18 $107,597
Vumerity Diroximel Fumarate Brand 12 $102,277
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 79 $97,148
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 58 $58,961
Briviact Brivaracetam Brand 34 $48,357
Nuedexta Dextromethorphan Hbr/Quinidine Brand 24 $36,289
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 42 $36,075
Aptiom Eslicarbazepine Acetate Brand 12 $30,661

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 71 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 98 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$243,081

Of which drugs: $55,231

Medicare patients

486

Average age 75

Services billed

4,755

298 women, 188 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 54%
Ischemic heart disease 41%
Depression 38%
Chronic kidney disease 37%
Diabetes 33%
Alzheimer's or dementia 22%
Heart failure 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 101 337 $308

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 36 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
QULIPTA
$62,487 79 —
UBRELVY
$15,517 82 —
Gocovri
$319 14 —
ULTOMIRIS
$301 — —
VYEPTI
$289 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 36 with Patron

Records

1,971 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Alabama

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record