Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Daniel Dees

Neurology Mobile, AL Medical Doctor

NPI 1700066677 CMS profile 32110

1601 Center Street, Ste 2S, Mobile, AL 36604

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$798,523

1,537 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$95,735 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2021–2023

Through program year 2025, Daniel Dees of Mobile, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $798,523 across 1,537 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $95,735 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $257,253 320
2024 General $102,718 205
2023 General $107,829 247
2022 General $98,740 191
2021 General $47,193 108
2020 General $23,406 82
2019 General $161,383 384

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Daniel Dees
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Daniel Dees were reported at $257,253. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Daniel Dees Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $161,383 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $23,406 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $47,193 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $98,740 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $107,829 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $102,718 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $257,253 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $366,248 382 payments
  2. US WorldMeds, LLC $133,042 235 payments
  3. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $87,518 158 payments
  4. Kyowa Kirin, Inc. $64,733 72 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $54,656 143 payments
  6. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc $30,242 81 payments
  7. Acorda Therapeutics, Inc $28,444 57 payments
  8. Lundbeck LLC $12,432 24 payments
  9. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. $5,741 10 payments
  10. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC $5,206 24 payments
  11. Other $10,260 351 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $540,631 207 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $93,604 369 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $65,746 21 payments
  4. Honoraria $60,158 21 payments
  5. Food and Beverage $37,929 914 payments
  6. Education $454 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Austedo XR $234,386 228 payments
  2. AUSTEDO $131,062 140 payments
  3. INGREZZA $66,382 112 payments
  4. NOURIANZ $64,733 72 payments
  5. VYALEV $52,581 54 payments
  6. APOKYN Neurology $50,085 115 payments
  7. NUPLAZID $29,712 57 payments
  8. INBRIJA $27,970 45 payments
  9. MYOBLOC $16,761 80 payments
  10. Apokyn Apomorphine Hydrochloride $13,423 15 payments
  11. Other $62,512 673 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 37 drugs

Part D claims

2,353

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$2,244,170

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

46.8%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ingrezza Valbenazine Tosylate Brand 75 $749,029
Austedo Xr Deutetrabenazine Brand 41 $562,718
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 68 $374,157
Austedo Deutetrabenazine Brand 17 $250,668
Rytary Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 25 $58,499
Nourianz Istradefylline Brand 20 $54,187
Carbidopa-Levodopa-Entacapone Carbidopa/Levodopa/Entacapone Brand 78 $41,198
Rasagiline Mesylate Generic 120 $36,547
Aptiom Eslicarbazepine Acetate Brand 11 $32,360
Carbidopa-Levodopa Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 572 $29,574

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 37 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 21 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$67,557

Of which drugs: $18,378

Medicare patients

234

Average age 72

Services billed

4,532

110 women, 124 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 47%
Depression 45%
Diabetes 34%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Heart failure 22%
Alzheimer's or dementia 20%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 43 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Austedo XR
$71,033 58 —
NOURIANZ
$15,757 20 —
Apokyn
$12,923 — —
INGREZZA
$359 75 —
BOTOX
$231 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 43 with Patron

Records

1,537 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Alabama

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record