Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kim Hont Yee

Hematology & Oncology Spartanburg, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1285639310 CMS profile 13178

120 Dillon Dr, Spartanburg, SC 29307

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$14,684

549 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$3,365 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2021–2023

Through program year 2025, Kim Hont Yee of Spartanburg, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $14,684 across 549 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $3,365 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 76th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $4,088 154
2024 General $3,513 151
2023 General $3,816 174
2022 General $1,523 48
2021 General $552 7
2020 General $566 8
2019 General $627 7

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kim Hont Yee
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kim Hont Yee were reported at $4,088. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Kim Hont Yee Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $627 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $566 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $552 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $1,523 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $3,816 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $3,513 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $4,088 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,333 43 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,202 46 payments
  3. Incyte Corporation $885 21 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $832 34 payments
  5. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $764 31 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $741 37 payments
  7. Celgene Corporation $621 35 payments
  8. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $609 22 payments
  9. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $554 19 payments
  10. Astellas Pharma US Inc $460 15 payments
  11. Other $6,683 246 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $13,713 538 payments
  2. Education $821 10 payments
  3. Honoraria $150 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. KEYTRUDA $745 30 payments
  2. DARZALEX $602 21 payments
  3. ENHERTU $427 13 payments
  4. TECVAYLI $408 12 payments
  5. Lenvima $366 16 payments
  6. IMBRUVICA $365 17 payments
  7. BRUKINSA $336 8 payments
  8. MONJUVI $334 13 payments
  9. REBLOZYL $321 20 payments
  10. TUKYSA $284 16 payments
  11. Other $11,508 477 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 49 drugs

Part D claims

1,388

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$4,227,066

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

35.4%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Brukinsa Zanubrutinib Brand 47 $673,768
Pomalyst Pomalidomide Brand 26 $577,551
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 23 $380,811
Lenalidomide Generic 25 $378,950
Jakafi Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 24 $377,168
Verzenio Abemaciclib Brand 23 $345,129
Cabometyx Cabozantinib S-Malate Brand 12 $287,174
Jaypirca Pirtobrutinib Brand 12 $269,889
Xtandi Enzalutamide Brand 20 $262,491
Venclexta Venetoclax Brand 17 $247,742

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 49 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 21 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$93,078

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

315

Average age 74

Services billed

1,396

191 women, 124 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Cancer 45%
Arthritis 43%
Diabetes 42%
Chronic kidney disease 42%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Depression 27%
Osteoporosis 24%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 61 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KEYTRUDA
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $179
$179 — —
ENHERTU
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $127
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $43
$170 — —
PEMAZYRE
  • Incyte Corporation $160
$160 — —
OPDIVO
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $156
$156 — —
Lenvima
  • Eisai Inc. $152
$152 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 61 with Patron

Records

549 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record