Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kenneth Bresky

Rheumatology Boynton Beach, FL Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1255368452 CMS profile 769177

10151 Enterprise Ctr Boulevard, Ste 100, Boynton Beach, FL 33437

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$34,064

1,400 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Kenneth Bresky of Boynton Beach, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $34,064 across 1,400 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $4,766 154
2024 General $5,033 190
2023 General $5,499 244
2022 General $4,856 241
2021 General $5,191 201
2020 General $3,448 161
2019 General $5,272 209

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kenneth Bresky
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kenneth Bresky were reported at $4,766. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Kenneth Bresky Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $5,272 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $3,448 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $5,191 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $4,856 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $5,499 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $5,033 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $4,766 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $6,304 371 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $4,710 155 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $4,343 101 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $2,860 115 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $2,765 128 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $2,164 126 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $2,105 57 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,060 42 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,023 43 payments
  10. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $951 43 payments
  11. Other $5,779 219 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $31,923 1,381 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $1,763 3 payments
  3. Grant $240 1 payment
  4. Education $139 15 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $3,873 69 payments
  2. RINVOQ $2,760 93 payments
  3. SIMPONI ARIA $2,197 41 payments
  4. XELJANZ $2,159 125 payments
  5. BENLYSTA $1,988 56 payments
  6. COSENTYX $1,921 75 payments
  7. Cimzia $1,824 93 payments
  8. EVENITY $1,646 83 payments
  9. Prolia $1,504 82 payments
  10. Enbrel $1,504 112 payments
  11. Other $19,729 909 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 45 drugs

Part D claims

2,738

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$704,407

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

42.7%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 40 $300,685
Prolia Denosumab Brand 112 $195,463
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 12 $86,031
Xtampza Er Oxycodone Myristate Brand 54 $33,529
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 22 $20,729
Oxycontin Oxycodone Hcl Brand 17 $15,010
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 259 $9,205
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 199 $7,074
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 206 $5,030
Morphine Sulfate Er Morphine Sulfate Brand 119 $4,407

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 45 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 33 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$566,059

Of which drugs: $482,752

Medicare patients

235

Average age 75

Services billed

77,341

168 women, 67 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 74%
Osteoporosis 54%
Ischemic heart disease 37%
Depression 33%
Diabetes 30%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Cancer 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 20 23,520 $183,555
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 13 42,000 $152,443
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 61 5,280 $92,858
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 12 960 $99

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 30 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
$1,200 — —
BENLYSTA
$435 — —
COSENTYX
$397 — —
Cimzia
$332 — 42,000
RINVOQ
$301 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 30 with Patron

Records

1,400 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record