Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kathleen Flint

Rheumatology Columbia, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1962490771 CMS profile 43363

1711 Saint Julian Pl, Columbia, SC 29204

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,475

768 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$6,926

Paid to them · 4 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$512,507 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2024

Through program year 2025, Kathleen Flint of Columbia, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,475 across 768 general payments and $6,926 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $512,507 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 84th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,536 132
2024 General $3,251 137
2023 General $2,157 104
2022 General $1,573 86
2021 General $835 49
2020 General $1,093 63
2020 Research $1,825 2
2019 General $3,031 197
2019 Research $5,101 2

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kathleen Flint
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kathleen Flint were reported at $3,536. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Kathleen Flint Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $3,031 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $1,093 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $835 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,573 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $2,157 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $3,251 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $3,536 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $2,851 145 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,753 80 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $1,335 82 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,306 79 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $1,211 55 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $930 38 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $887 53 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $874 32 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $525 37 payments
  10. Octapharma USA, Inc. $503 5 payments
  11. Other $3,299 162 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,445 765 payments
  2. Education $30 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. XELJANZ $1,292 79 payments
  2. RINVOQ $1,006 44 payments
  3. SAPHNELO $930 38 payments
  4. Cimzia $907 43 payments
  5. Otezla $901 36 payments
  6. TALTZ $886 52 payments
  7. BENLYSTA $874 32 payments
  8. COSENTYX $741 50 payments
  9. Enbrel $692 31 payments
  10. Prolia $650 36 payments
  11. Other $8,186 405 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $5,763 2 payments
  2. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $1,162 2 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 50 drugs

Part D claims

2,452

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$3,200,034

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

33.6%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 75 $813,647
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 51 $443,104
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 51 $429,952
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 24 $262,025
Enbrel Mini Etanercept Brand 25 $225,979
Otezla Apremilast Brand 41 $196,226
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 19 $161,288
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 22 $133,133
Actemra Actpen Tocilizumab Brand 23 $106,879
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 13 $105,978

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 50 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 62 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$2,750,283

Of which drugs: $2,476,826

Medicare patients

597

Average age 75

Services billed

224,472

513 women, 84 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 32%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Diabetes 28%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Depression 27%
Heart failure 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 41 27,100 $885,517
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 71 63,600 $556,506
Injection, tocilizumab, 1 mg J3262 Office 14 60,840 $286,240
Injection, infliximab-abda, biosimilar, (renflexis), 10 mg Q5104 Office 27 7,740 $177,850
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 46 4,380 $89,571

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
SAPHNELO
$294 — —
Enbrel
$291 127 —
RINVOQ
$247 24 —
Cimzia
$213 — —
BENLYSTA
$212 13 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

772 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record