Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Katherine Pearce

Internal Medicine Baton Rouge, LA Medical Doctor

NPI 1871593368 CMS profile 266751

5131 Odonovan Dr, Suite 201, Baton Rouge, LA 70808

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$11,322

541 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$11,942,591 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2022–2025

Through program year 2025, Katherine Pearce of Baton Rouge, LA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,322 across 541 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $11,942,591 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,299 77
2024 General $2,972 92
2023 General $1,430 90
2022 General $1,214 71
2021 General $1,168 69
2020 General $751 44
2019 General $1,488 98

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Katherine Pearce
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Katherine Pearce were reported at $2,299. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Katherine Pearce Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,488 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $751 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,168 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,214 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,430 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,972 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,299 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,879 121 payments
  2. Moderna TX, Inc. $1,432 9 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $954 3 payments
  4. Novo Nordisk Inc $785 52 payments
  5. Astellas Pharma US Inc $727 31 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $652 40 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $649 43 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $502 29 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $408 24 payments
  10. Abbott Laboratories $367 10 payments
  11. Other $2,966 179 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,526 533 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $1,671 5 payments
  3. Education $125 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $1,032 72 payments
  2. QULIPTA $501 42 payments
  3. Ozempic $476 33 payments
  4. Veozah $397 18 payments
  5. JARDIANCE $378 23 payments
  6. RYBELSUS $328 22 payments
  7. Prolia $304 17 payments
  8. EVENITY $285 16 payments
  9. VRAYLAR $264 16 payments
  10. TRADJENTA $249 16 payments
  11. Other $8,096 484 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 103 drugs

Part D claims

6,853

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$708,588

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

25.1%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 134 $162,053
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 124 $153,181
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 129 $116,026
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 38 $43,957
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 31 $35,529
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 20 $20,921
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 23 $16,383
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 18 $16,170
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 12 $11,810
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 14 $11,305

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 103 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 34 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$84,469

Of which drugs: $11,380

Medicare patients

220

Average age 74

Services billed

1,240

220 women, 0 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 45%
Depression 28%
Osteoporosis 28%
Diabetes 16%
Cancer 12%
Ischemic heart disease 11%
Chronic kidney disease 11%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 23 23 $6,635
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from recombinant dna 90673 Office 56 56 $4,582

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 31 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $213
$213 — —
Veozah
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $168
$168 — —
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $88
$88 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $82
$82 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $71
$71 129 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 31 with Patron

Records

541 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Louisiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record