Product Program year 2024 Source: CMS Open Payments

Tradjenta

Drug Diabetes

NDC 0597-0140-30

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,967,480

89,704 payments

Research payments

$9,213,222

1,643 payments

Through program year 2024, $1,967,480 in general payments and $9,213,222 in research payments were reported against Tradjenta (Diabetes).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

12 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2024 General $168,621 8,991
2024 Research $188,685 8
2023 General $287,626 13,654
2023 Research $1,735,961 42
2022 General $305,203 16,353
2022 Research $1,218,342 116
2021 General $362,398 19,779
2021 Research $1,560,563 291
2020 General $265,200 10,580
2020 Research $2,216,563 556
2019 General $578,432 20,347
2019 Research $2,293,109 630

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,653,735 89,329 payments
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim b.v. $129,191 22 payments
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH $93,006 71 payments
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim (Phil.) Inc. $33,535 1 payment
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim Singapore Pte. Ltd. $31,800 7 payments
  6. Eli Lilly and Company $9,975 5 payments
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Mexico SA de CV $9,800 4 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $3,438 264 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim India PVT. Ltd. $3,000 1 payment
Top recipients General payments · program year 2024
  1. David Lichtinger Internal Medicine · Leesburg, FL $241 <1% · 9 payments
  2. Shiao-Ang Shih Internal Medicine · Haverhill, MA $233 <1% · 11 payments
  3. Brian Schlesinger Physician Assistant, Medical · Palmdale, CA $231 <1% · 13 payments
  4. Wagdy Habashy Internal Medicine · Plainfield, CT $231 <1% · 16 payments
  5. Sherry Sussman Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism · Smithtown, NY $230 <1% · 7 payments

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2024.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2024
  1. Family Medicine $49,384 30% · 1,394 practitioners
  2. Internal Medicine $35,239 21% · 993 practitioners
  3. Nurse Practitioner, Family Nurse Practitioner $28,579 17% · 880 practitioners
  4. Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Internal Medicine $14,317 9% · 307 practitioners
  5. Physician Assistant $13,363 8% · 386 practitioners

The top 5 of 52 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2024. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2024
  1. New York $19,052 11% · 427 recipients
  2. California $14,664 9% · 376 recipients
  3. Pennsylvania $13,064 8% · 377 recipients
  4. Florida $10,393 6% · 297 recipients
  5. Illinois $10,050 6% · 260 recipients

The top 5 of 47 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2024 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

Prescribed to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024

Part D claims

1,106,446

Prescriptions dispensed, refills included

Drug cost

$776,080,948

Paid at the pharmacy, in all

Prescribers

35,466

With 11 or more claims of it

Medicare Part D drugs matched to TRADJENTA, 2024
Part D drug Name match Relative to the largest Prescribers Claims Drug cost
Tradjenta Linagliptin Same name 35,466 1,106,446 $776,080,948

Matched to this product by name; CMS does not link its files to Open Payments, so a similar name can be a different strength, form or brand. Prescriber counts include only prescribers with 11 or more claims of the drug, because CMS publishes nothing below that. Part D covers drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries at a pharmacy; it does not include drugs given in a clinic or hospital, or patients with other insurance.

Largest prescribers

First 5 of 100 by claims · 2024

Two separate records. Claims come from Medicare and related payments from Open Payments. They are shown in one row because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

The prescribers with the most Part D claims of this drug in 2024
Prescriber Specialty State Claims Drug cost Related payments
Wei Sun Nephrology NY 1,338 $779,043 None on record
Timothy Estes Family Practice MS 991 $184,859 None on record
Dmitri Kirpichnikov Endocrinology NY 911 $516,761 None on record
Chinh Mai Internal Medicine CA 866 $453,479 None on record
Syed Hashmi Internal Medicine MO 768 $215,424 None on record

"No profile" means the prescriber has no Open Payments record here; "None on record" means no payment naming this product in the payment year. Related payments are general payments, and one that names several products is split evenly, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it. The list is the prescribers with the most claims, up to 100 per drug.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 100 with Patron
89,704 general · 1,643 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2024

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record