Medical Doctor Program year 2023 Reported 2019–2023 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

John Budd

Rheumatology Saint Louis, MO Medical Doctor

NPI 1669425989 CMS profile 211520

520 S Elm Ave, Saint Louis, MO 63119

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$16,544

1,104 records reported · program years 2019–2023

Research payments

$1,647

Paid to them · 13 records reported · program years 2019–2023

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$387,942 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2024

Through program year 2023, John Budd of Saint Louis, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,544 across 1,104 general payments and $1,647 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $387,942 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 81st percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2023 General $2,954 167
2022 General $3,515 212
2021 General $3,362 249
2020 General $2,949 204
2020 Research $161 2
2019 General $3,764 272
2019 Research $1,486 11

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • John Budd
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to John Budd were reported at $0. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year John Budd Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $3,764 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $2,949 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $3,362 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $3,515 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $2,954 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $0 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $0 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,371 150 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $2,119 171 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $1,963 132 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $1,893 155 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $1,238 80 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,112 78 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $1,083 72 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,061 65 payments
  9. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $543 22 payments
  10. Genentech USA, Inc. $514 25 payments
  11. Other $2,649 154 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. Food and Beverage $16,453 1,102 payments
  2. Education $91 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. SIMPONI ARIA $1,533 131 payments
  2. RINVOQ $1,496 95 payments
  3. XELJANZ $1,434 124 payments
  4. Cimzia $1,238 80 payments
  5. STELARA $1,082 93 payments
  6. ORENCIA $1,069 71 payments
  7. BENLYSTA $960 64 payments
  8. COSENTYX $947 65 payments
  9. TREMFYA $890 53 payments
  10. SIMPONI $867 80 payments
  11. Other $9,573 611 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,168 10 payments
  2. Eli Lilly and Company $479 3 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 2 drugs

Part D claims

32

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,250

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

43.8%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 18 $916
Butalbital-Acetaminophen-Caffe Butalb/Acetaminophen/Caffeine Brand 14 $334

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Records

1,117 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2023

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record