Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Alfred Kim

Rheumatology Saint Louis, MO Medical Doctor

NPI 1124105234 CMS profile 51371

4921 Parkview Pl, Div Im Rheumatology, Ste 5C, Saint Louis, MO 63110

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$486,246

763 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$695,811 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Alfred Kim of Saint Louis, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $486,246 across 763 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $695,811 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $85,744 196
2024 General $67,247 140
2023 General $76,368 134
2022 General $148,463 150
2021 General $53,570 69
2020 General $39,599 31
2019 General $15,254 43

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Alfred Kim
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Alfred Kim were reported at $85,744. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Alfred Kim Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $15,254 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $39,599 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $53,570 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $148,463 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $76,368 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $67,247 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $85,744 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $361,069 328 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $27,768 91 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $21,028 29 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $20,651 40 payments
  5. Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $11,798 33 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $10,133 53 payments
  7. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $6,523 87 payments
  8. Invivyd Inc $4,999 6 payments
  9. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $3,801 4 payments
  10. Amgen Inc. $2,988 7 payments
  11. Other $15,488 85 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $264,885 100 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $109,047 51 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $70,694 230 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $22,111 367 payments
  5. Honoraria $19,482 11 payments
  6. Education $25 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. BENLYSTA $286,169 276 payments
  2. XELJANZ $13,724 4 payments
  3. RINVOQ $9,867 23 payments
  4. TREMFYA $8,988 89 payments
  5. COSENTYX $7,892 13 payments
  6. LUPKYNIS $6,711 29 payments
  7. NUCALA $4,489 8 payments
  8. SAPHNELO $3,984 35 payments
  9. PEMGARDA $3,274 5 payments
  10. EVUSHELD $3,026 5 payments
  11. Other $15,635 56 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 17 drugs

Part D claims

521

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$139,595

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

37.2%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 14 $75,065
Xeljanz Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 14 $49,181
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 113 $5,194
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 77 $2,493
Mycophenolate Mofetil Generic 14 $2,240
Methylprednisolone Generic 29 $1,758
Valganciclovir Hcl Generic 13 $1,239
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 24 $1,036
Prednisone Generic 86 $415
Gabapentin Generic 21 $245

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 17 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 24 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$55,762

Of which drugs: $46,624

Medicare patients

74

Average age 63

Services billed

5,577

54 women, 20 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 69%
Arthritis 58%
Chronic kidney disease 38%
Diabetes 34%
Depression 32%
Osteoporosis 28%
Heart failure 23%
Ischemic heart disease 23%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 8 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BENLYSTA
$16,120 — —
TREMFYA
$2,950 — —
SAPHNELO
$562 — —
COSENTYX
$249 — —
RINVOQ
$193 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 8 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

763 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record