Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jazibeh Qureshi

Rheumatology Catonsville, MD Medical Doctor

NPI 1831318583 CMS profile 355272

724 Maiden Choice Ln Ste 201, Catonsville, MD 21228

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$21,487

1,101 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jazibeh Qureshi of Catonsville, MD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $21,487 across 1,101 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 84th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,929 172
2024 General $3,433 167
2023 General $3,420 157
2022 General $3,409 161
2021 General $2,858 139
2020 General $1,952 110
2019 General $2,487 195

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jazibeh Qureshi
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jazibeh Qureshi were reported at $3,929. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Jazibeh Qureshi Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,487 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $1,952 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $2,858 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $3,409 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $3,420 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $3,433 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $3,929 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $3,408 168 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $3,002 158 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $2,611 119 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $2,425 108 payments
  5. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $1,037 51 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $963 59 payments
  7. Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $864 40 payments
  8. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $849 59 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $734 32 payments
  10. Radius Health, Inc. $691 35 payments
  11. Other $4,904 272 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $21,045 1,094 payments
  2. Education $443 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Cimzia $2,084 98 payments
  2. RINVOQ $1,695 100 payments
  3. TREMFYA $1,662 61 payments
  4. Prolia $1,197 65 payments
  5. EVENITY $1,163 63 payments
  6. ACTHAR $1,037 51 payments
  7. LUPKYNIS $864 40 payments
  8. XELJANZ $849 52 payments
  9. ORENCIA $840 58 payments
  10. SKYRIZI $668 20 payments
  11. Other $12,561 668 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 35 drugs

Part D claims

2,428

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$2,136,938

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

27.3%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 72 $564,361
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 55 $356,430
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 39 $332,581
Kevzara Sarilumab Brand 33 $192,941
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 33 $155,441
Cimzia (2 Pack) Certolizumab Pegol Brand 19 $139,885
Enbrel Mini Etanercept Brand 17 $119,082
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 11 $70,076
Otezla Apremilast Brand 12 $59,626
Olumiant Baricitinib Brand 11 $40,768

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 35 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 42 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$2,036,724

Of which drugs: $1,729,357

Medicare patients

597

Average age 71

Services billed

151,552

494 women, 103 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 43%
Diabetes 32%
Depression 28%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
COPD 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 142 14,160 $291,625
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 14 7,426 $246,955
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 27 27,510 $236,259
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 17 57,600 $207,971
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 13 65 $314
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 40 334 $257
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 14 1,440 $148

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 33 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LUPKYNIS
$278 — —
Cimzia
$277 19 57,600
RINVOQ
$272 55 —
KRYSTEXXA
$244 — —
TREMFYA
$199 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 33 with Patron

Records

1,101 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Maryland

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record