Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jane Derrig

Rheumatology Suffolk, VA Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1265495758 CMS profile 193954

2000 Meade Parkway, Suffolk, VA 23434

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$22,892

1,353 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jane Derrig of Suffolk, VA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $22,892 across 1,353 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 84th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,059 164
2024 General $2,444 130
2023 General $3,333 186
2022 General $3,835 202
2021 General $3,593 228
2020 General $3,197 205
2019 General $3,431 238

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jane Derrig
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jane Derrig were reported at $3,059. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Jane Derrig Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $3,431 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $3,197 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $3,593 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $3,835 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $3,333 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $2,444 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $3,059 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $5,722 357 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $2,324 146 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $2,058 112 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $2,011 146 payments
  5. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $1,310 67 payments
  6. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,154 62 payments
  7. Radius Health, Inc. $1,152 70 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,042 51 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $864 46 payments
  10. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $766 42 payments
  11. Other $4,487 254 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $22,757 1,347 payments
  2. Education $134 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Otezla $2,687 152 payments
  2. XELJANZ $1,912 122 payments
  3. Enbrel Inflammation $1,818 91 payments
  4. Cimzia $1,679 120 payments
  5. Enbrel Inflammation $1,485 99 payments
  6. Prolia $1,425 95 payments
  7. RINVOQ $1,350 74 payments
  8. ACTHAR $1,310 67 payments
  9. EVENITY $895 54 payments
  10. TALTZ $825 42 payments
  11. Other $12,611 746 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 38 drugs

Part D claims

3,388

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,506,571

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

20.4%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 41 $468,608
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 26 $181,211
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 30 $133,339
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 21 $130,672
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 15 $107,635
Otezla Apremilast Brand 17 $82,722
Humira Adalimumab Brand 12 $81,641
Cosentyx (2 Syringes) Secukinumab Brand 11 $78,767
Cimzia (2 Pack) Certolizumab Pegol Brand 12 $67,530
Prolia Denosumab Brand 35 $62,117

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 38 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 53 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,439,893

Of which drugs: $1,256,847

Medicare patients

946

Average age 74

Services billed

169,353

791 women, 155 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 67%
Osteoporosis 40%
Diabetes 29%
Ischemic heart disease 18%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
COPD 17%
Heart failure 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 175 18,540 $378,785
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 23 85,200 $308,015
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 23 35,280 $300,141
Hyaluronan or derivative, euflexxa, for intra-articular injection, per dose J7323 Office 11 38 $3,562
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 64 320 $1,446
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 115 906 $652
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 76 268 $131

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 29 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Enbrel
$337 15 —
Otezla
$235 17 —
RINVOQ
$219 21 —
XELJANZ
$188 26 —
Cimzia
$166 12 85,200

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 29 with Patron

Records

1,353 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Virginia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record