Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

James Loveless

Rheumatology Boise, ID Medical Doctor

NPI 1396851341 CMS profile 915324

600 N Robbins Rd, Ste 100, Boise, ID 83702

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$11,529

71 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$1,386

Paid to them · 3 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$381,554 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, James Loveless of Boise, ID is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,529 across 71 general payments and $1,386 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $381,554 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 76th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $248 3
2024 General $529 7
2024 Research $105 1
2023 General $367 6
2022 General $193 4
2022 Research $108 1
2021 Research $1,173 1
2020 General $20 3
2019 General $10,173 48

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • James Loveless
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to James Loveless were reported at $248. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year James Loveless Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $10,173 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $20 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $0 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $193 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $367 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $529 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $248 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Genentech, Inc. $5,348 5 payments
  2. Genentech USA, Inc. $2,637 5 payments
  3. UCB Biosciences Inc. $1,372 9 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $1,031 20 payments
  5. Radius Health, Inc. $417 7 payments
  6. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $213 6 payments
  7. Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. $123 1 payment
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $122 1 payment
  9. UCB, Inc. $106 1 payment
  10. Pfizer Inc. $60 11 payments
  11. Other $101 5 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $4,000 1 payment
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $2,625 3 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $2,603 59 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $2,193 6 payments
  5. Education $109 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Actemra $7,985 10 payments
  2. EVENITY $534 10 payments
  3. Tymlos Endocrinology $283 5 payments
  4. Prolia $249 9 payments
  5. Tymlos Endocrinology $134 2 payments
  6. TREMFYA $126 2 payments
  7. Crysvita $123 1 payment
  8. SAPHNELO $122 1 payment
  9. Bimzelx $106 1 payment
  10. SIMPONI ARIA $88 4 payments
  11. Other $337 26 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG $1,173 1 payment
  2. Eli Lilly and Company $213 2 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 33 drugs

Part D claims

1,184

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,020,301

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

32.9%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 22 $135,074
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 17 $132,354
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 17 $131,682
Forteo Teriparatide Brand 29 $114,331
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 16 $97,373
Xeljanz Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 17 $94,613
Actemra Actpen Tocilizumab Brand 12 $81,526
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 11 $76,151
Tymlos Abaloparatide Brand 23 $59,495
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 12 $52,317

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 33 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 10 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$9,355

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

110

Average age 74

Services billed

165

80 women, 30 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 65%
Osteoporosis 50%
Depression 23%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Diabetes 21%
Ischemic heart disease 18%
Atrial fibrillation 14%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

3 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Tymlos
  • Radius Health, Inc. $134
$134 23 —
EVENITY
  • Amgen Inc. $129
$129 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $126
$126 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

74 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Idaho

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record