Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Craig Scoville

Rheumatology Idaho Falls, ID Medical Doctor

NPI 1194818997 CMS profile 53766

2220 E 25Th St, Idaho Falls, ID 83404

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$26,375

1,325 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$1,562

Paid to them · 9 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$726,656 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2024

Through program year 2025, Craig Scoville of Idaho Falls, ID is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $26,375 across 1,325 general payments and $1,562 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $726,656 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 86th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,419 224
2024 General $3,141 201
2023 General $3,145 192
2022 General $2,901 187
2021 General $1,917 141
2020 General $7,123 124
2019 General $4,730 256
2019 Research $1,562 9

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Craig Scoville
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Craig Scoville were reported at $3,419. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Craig Scoville Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $4,730 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $7,123 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $1,917 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $2,901 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $3,145 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $3,141 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $3,419 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $6,506 501 payments
  2. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $6,227 14 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $2,454 143 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,699 85 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $1,445 81 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,049 82 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $1,030 62 payments
  8. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $804 41 payments
  9. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $791 35 payments
  10. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $771 52 payments
  11. Other $3,599 229 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $19,798 1,302 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $5,040 1 payment
  3. Travel and Lodging $777 3 payments
  4. Education $759 19 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. KEVZARA $6,379 21 payments
  2. Otezla $1,639 147 payments
  3. RINVOQ $1,620 87 payments
  4. Enbrel Inflammation $1,483 120 payments
  5. Prolia $1,265 101 payments
  6. Enbrel Inflammation $1,245 117 payments
  7. TAVNEOS $1,068 85 payments
  8. BENLYSTA $1,049 82 payments
  9. COSENTYX $959 45 payments
  10. EVENITY $907 67 payments
  11. Other $11,688 715 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,562 9 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 35 drugs

Part D claims

2,386

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$261,969

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

8.2%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 13 $118,552
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 13 $73,451
Celecoxib Generic 325 $21,941
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 530 $11,572
Leflunomide Generic 65 $7,736
Cevimeline Hcl Generic 22 $5,190
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 158 $2,765
Colchicine Generic 43 $2,720
Duloxetine Hcl Generic 87 $1,835
Omeprazole Generic 214 $1,710

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 35 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 8 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$20,183

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

97

Average age 72

Services billed

209

70 women, 27 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 71%
Osteoporosis 32%
Diabetes 26%
Depression 26%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Atrial fibrillation 13%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 30 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TAVNEOS
$512 — —
Enbrel
$335 — —
COSENTYX
$314 — —
RINVOQ
$241 — —
SKYRIZI
$200 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 30 with Patron

Records

1,334 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Idaho

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record