Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ian Anderson

Hematology & Oncology Santa Rosa, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1518055573 CMS profile 340505

3555 Round Barn Cir, Santa Rosa, CA 95403

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,166

312 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$3,705

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$8,009,477 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Ian Anderson of Santa Rosa, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,166 across 312 general payments and $3,705 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $8,009,477 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 73rd percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $778 30
2024 General $604 22
2023 General $531 20
2022 General $1,898 50
2021 General $1,859 66
2020 General $1,111 41
2019 General $1,386 83
2019 Research $3,705 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ian Anderson
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ian Anderson were reported at $778. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Ian Anderson Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,386 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $1,111 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $1,859 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $1,898 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $531 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $604 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $778 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. EMD Serono, Inc. $1,636 13 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $870 33 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $442 20 payments
  4. Pharmacyclics LLC, An AbbVie Company $365 14 payments
  5. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $358 24 payments
  6. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $348 17 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $319 16 payments
  8. Celgene Corporation $291 14 payments
  9. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $287 16 payments
  10. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $249 15 payments
  11. Other $3,001 130 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $5,847 281 payments
  2. Education $1,383 24 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $937 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. LORBRENA $362 7 payments
  2. KEYTRUDA $332 16 payments
  3. IMBRUVICA Oncology $305 14 payments
  4. ZEJULA Oncology $241 11 payments
  5. IBRANCE $212 12 payments
  6. INLYTA $154 3 payments
  7. PYLARIFY $150 1 payment
  8. ZEJULA Oncology $144 7 payments
  9. ENHERTU $141 7 payments
  10. IMBRUVICA Oncology $140 10 payments
  11. Other $4,747 231 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $3,705 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 44 drugs

Part D claims

1,678

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$4,413,946

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

26.3%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Tagrisso Osimertinib Mesylate Brand 47 $765,286
Verzenio Abemaciclib Brand 41 $520,617
Ibrance Palbociclib Brand 32 $516,927
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 38 $511,250
Alecensa Alectinib Hcl Brand 26 $482,565
Lenalidomide Generic 42 $473,451
Jakafi Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 24 $395,264
Calquence Acalabrutinib Maleate Brand 23 $343,365
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 14 $224,221
Abiraterone Acetate Generic 41 $75,436

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 44 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 17 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$195,376

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

630

Average age 76

Services billed

1,963

384 women, 246 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 65%
Cancer 56%
Arthritis 43%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Osteoporosis 26%
Atrial fibrillation 25%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Diabetes 23%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 18 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
OGSIVEO
  • SpringWorks Therapeutics, Inc. $64
$64 — —
ENHERTU
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $34
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $28
$62 — —
Orserdu
  • Stemline Therapeutics Inc. $43
$43 — —
EPKINLY
  • Genmab U.S., Inc. $23
  • AbbVie, Inc. $14
$36 — —
DARZALEX
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $36
$36 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 18 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

313 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record