Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Himmat Gill

Rheumatology Fresno, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1891728838 CMS profile 176890

7135 N Chestnut Ave, Suite 104, Fresno, CA 93720

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$14,377

588 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Himmat Gill of Fresno, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $14,377 across 588 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 78th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,551 116
2024 General $2,608 99
2023 General $2,615 93
2022 General $1,862 77
2021 General $1,976 80
2020 General $1,313 68
2019 General $1,451 55

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Himmat Gill
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Himmat Gill were reported at $2,551. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Himmat Gill Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,451 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $1,313 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $1,976 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,862 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $2,615 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $2,608 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,551 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $2,865 123 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,927 85 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $1,206 58 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,142 61 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,011 38 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $995 17 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $922 37 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $660 34 payments
  9. Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $589 15 payments
  10. Horizon Therapeutics plc $455 22 payments
  11. Other $2,604 98 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,225 583 payments
  2. Education $152 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $1,144 51 payments
  2. BENLYSTA $922 37 payments
  3. Prolia $842 35 payments
  4. EVENITY $832 34 payments
  5. TREMFYA $824 35 payments
  6. SIMPONI ARIA $798 39 payments
  7. Cimzia $777 41 payments
  8. Enbrel $593 19 payments
  9. LUPKYNIS $589 15 payments
  10. XELJANZ $530 26 payments
  11. Other $8,424 364 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 28 drugs

Part D claims

3,816

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$4,962,304

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

44.3%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 245 $1,889,996
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 152 $1,040,181
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 82 $560,448
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 50 $280,187
Cimzia (2 Pack) Certolizumab Pegol Brand 33 $182,569
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 28 $162,836
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 22 $156,793
Simponi Golimumab Brand 11 $125,175
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 13 $124,411
Kevzara Sarilumab Brand 21 $88,290

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 28 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 50 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$4,431,024

Of which drugs: $4,119,184

Medicare patients

1,386

Average age 75

Services billed

329,739

1,187 women, 199 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Osteoporosis 75%
Arthritis 62%
Ischemic heart disease 35%
Chronic kidney disease 35%
Diabetes 30%
Depression 20%
Heart failure 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 653 63,720 $1,300,360
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 85 85,890 $727,669
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 27 70,400 $255,369
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 24 7,970 $197,330
Injection, inclisiran, 1 mg J1306 Office 33 18,176 $173,121
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 18 11,250 $102,347
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 245 1,230 $5,710
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 50 4,381 $430
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 16 928 $126
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 24 24 $121

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 25 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BENLYSTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $361
$361 — —
KRYSTEXXA
  • Amgen Inc. $286
$286 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $285
$285 82 —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $194
$194 — —
LUPKYNIS
  • Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $176
$176 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 25 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

588 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record