Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Helen Feng

Rheumatology San Jose, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1629174149 CMS profile 164705

2242 Camden Ave, Suite 203, San Jose, CA 95124

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$33,557

1,467 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$4,287 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2021

Through program year 2025, Helen Feng of San Jose, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $33,557 across 1,467 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $4,287 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $5,136 181
2024 General $6,048 214
2023 General $5,069 215
2022 General $3,903 198
2021 General $3,447 187
2020 General $2,785 126
2019 General $7,167 346

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Helen Feng
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Helen Feng were reported at $5,136. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Helen Feng Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $7,167 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $2,785 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $3,447 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $3,903 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $5,069 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $6,048 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $5,136 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $6,214 338 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $5,042 197 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $2,824 85 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $2,491 121 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,806 72 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $1,704 82 payments
  7. Horizon Therapeutics plc $1,573 80 payments
  8. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $1,496 58 payments
  9. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,496 55 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,416 62 payments
  11. Other $7,495 317 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $33,052 1,437 payments
  2. Education $504 30 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $2,750 134 payments
  2. TREMFYA $1,995 88 payments
  3. Cimzia $1,924 68 payments
  4. BENLYSTA $1,802 71 payments
  5. Otezla $1,649 97 payments
  6. Enbrel $1,592 111 payments
  7. XELJANZ $1,563 72 payments
  8. ACTHAR $1,496 58 payments
  9. SAPHNELO $1,496 55 payments
  10. Prolia $1,211 63 payments
  11. Other $20,596 915 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 34 drugs

Part D claims

1,789

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,300,665

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

31.7%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 29 $204,582
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 23 $169,234
Prolia Denosumab Brand 95 $164,313
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 21 $131,657
Orencia Abatacept/Maltose Brand 27 $112,884
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 99 $93,868
Enbrel Mini Etanercept Brand 12 $86,855
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 12 $63,894
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 13 $59,254
Tymlos Abaloparatide Brand 21 $54,182

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 34 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 35 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$964,852

Of which drugs: $644,886

Medicare patients

315

Average age 77

Services billed

63,718

249 women, 66 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 69%
Diabetes 26%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
Depression 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 149 15,424 $318,797
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 21 183 $1,009
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 11 1,040 $106
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 15 123 $64

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$657 21 —
TREMFYA
$590 — —
ACTHAR
$549 — —
Enbrel
$544 35 —
TAVNEOS
$375 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

1,467 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record