Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Hany Demo

Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Chicago, IL Medical Doctor

NPI 1790964484 CMS profile 263319

5140 N California Ave Ste 780, Ste 700, Chicago, IL 60625

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$297,043

652 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Hany Demo of Chicago, IL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $297,043 across 652 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $50,259 122
2024 General $83,292 174
2023 General $23,959 82
2022 General $24,001 76
2021 General $39,028 61
2020 General $54,307 72
2019 General $22,197 65

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Hany Demo
  • Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median
  • Middle half of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Hany Demo were reported at $50,259. Among 3,064 Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles paid that year, the median was $2,462 and the middle half received between $733 and $7,710.

Show as a table
Year Hany Demo Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median Middle half National median
2019 $22,197 $2,361 $585–$8,260 $163
2020 $54,307 $993 $247–$4,351 $114
2021 $39,028 $1,185 $326–$4,739 $132
2022 $24,001 $2,073 $554–$6,789 $149
2023 $23,959 $2,568 $759–$8,159 $160
2024 $83,292 $2,557 $703–$7,403 $164
2025 $50,259 $2,462 $733–$7,710 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $172,756 276 payments
  2. Medtronic, Inc. $103,067 231 payments
  3. Medtronic Vascular, Inc. $12,491 19 payments
  4. Baylis Medical Company Inc $3,614 4 payments
  5. Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. $1,650 1 payment
  6. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $651 37 payments
  7. Biotronik Inc. $543 10 payments
  8. Boston Scientific Corporation $434 10 payments
  9. Biosense Webster, Inc. $269 2 payments
  10. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $264 12 payments
  11. Other $1,303 50 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $138,092 95 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $96,774 45 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $26,834 124 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $19,099 376 payments
  5. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a non-accredited and noncertified continuing education program $16,245 12 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ensite Cardiac Mapping System $43,722 45 payments
  2. ADVISOR $21,180 25 payments
  3. ViewFlex Xtra ICE Catheter $16,400 2 payments
  4. ViewMate Intracardiac Echo $12,851 14 payments
  5. NA $12,243 7 payments
  6. Arctic Front $12,193 14 payments
  7. ENSITE PRECISION $10,331 41 payments
  8. EnSite Precision Cardiac Mapping System $8,941 7 payments
  9. ENSITE $8,138 13 payments
  10. VIEWMATE $6,290 7 payments
  11. Other $56,142 362 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 15 drugs

Part D claims

882

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: 1,090

Drug cost

$297,270

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: $354,841

Branded share of claims

30.6%

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: 38.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 205 $274,635
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 11 $9,427
Amiodarone Hcl Generic 128 $5,802
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 190 $2,338
Flecainide Acetate Generic 46 $2,013
Metoprolol Tartrate Generic 82 $794
Amlodipine Besylate Generic 43 $556
Diltiazem 24hr Er (Cd) Diltiazem Hcl Brand 26 $506
Sotalol Sotalol Hcl Brand 28 $473
Carvedilol Generic 37 $238

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 15 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,573 Part D prescribers listed as Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 68 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$261,025

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

897

Average age 78

Services billed

3,041

480 women, 417 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Atrial fibrillation 56%
Ischemic heart disease 54%
Arthritis 53%
Diabetes 50%
Heart failure 50%
Chronic kidney disease 37%
COPD 25%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

3 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Arcalyst
  • Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals International, plc $63
$63 — —
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $17
$17 — —
ENTRESTO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $17
$17 11 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

652 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology in Illinois

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record