Product Program year 2020 Source: CMS Open Payments

Ensite Cardiac Mapping System

Device Cardiac Arrhythmias and Heart Failure

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,685,026

12,849 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Through program year 2020, $3,685,026 in general payments and $0 in research payments were reported against Ensite Cardiac Mapping System (Cardiac Arrhythmias and Heart Failure).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2020 General $1,668,807 5,563
2019 General $2,016,219 7,286

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. Abbott Laboratories $3,685,026 12,849 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2020
  1. Roderick Tung Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Chicago, IL $52,049 3% · 53 payments
  2. Rajdeep Gaitonde Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Louisville, KY $49,781 3% · 55 payments
  3. Joseph Dell Orfano Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Hartford, CT $47,812 3% · 46 payments
  4. Childrens Hospital Medical Center Teaching hospital · OH $40,000 2% · 1 payment
  5. Nicholas Olson Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · La Jolla, CA $38,661 2% · 47 payments

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2020.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2020
  1. Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Internal Medicine $1,151,351 74% · 696 practitioners
  2. Cardiovascular Disease Internal Medicine $274,190 18% · 336 practitioners
  3. Interventional Cardiology Internal Medicine $45,614 3% · 173 practitioners
  4. Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology Internal Medicine $37,865 2% · 39 practitioners
  5. Pediatric Cardiology Pediatrics $17,408 1% · 28 practitioners

The top 5 of 35 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2020. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2020
  1. California $177,760 11% · 109 recipients
  2. Illinois $170,856 10% · 58 recipients
  3. Texas $157,509 9% · 220 recipients
  4. Florida $107,215 6% · 98 recipients
  5. Ohio $105,773 6% · 68 recipients

The top 5 of 49 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2020 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

12,849 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record