Product Program year 2021 Source: CMS Open Payments

ViewFlex Xtra ICE Catheter

Device Electrophysiology

PDI 10888551045216

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$49,871

347 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Through program year 2021, $49,871 in general payments and $0 in research payments were reported against ViewFlex Xtra ICE Catheter (Electrophysiology).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2021 General $49,871 347

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2021
  1. Abbott Laboratories $49,871 347 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2021
  1. Hany Demo Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Chicago, IL $16,400 33% · 2 payments
  2. Mansour Razminia Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Palos Heights, IL $14,315 29% · 12 payments
  3. Srikanth Sundaram Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Littleton, CO $6,750 14% · 1 payment
  4. Robert Schaller Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Philadelphia, PA $4,194 8% · 5 payments
  5. Arjun Gururaj Cardiovascular Disease · Las Vegas, NV $312 <1% · 2 payments

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2021.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2021
  1. Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Internal Medicine $46,571 93% · 108 practitioners
  2. Cardiovascular Disease Internal Medicine $1,641 3% · 29 practitioners
  3. Interventional Cardiology Internal Medicine $478 <1% · 11 practitioners
  4. Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology Internal Medicine $227 <1% · 2 practitioners
  5. Nurse Practitioner, Family Nurse Practitioner $223 <1% · 8 practitioners

The top 5 of 25 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2021. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2021
  1. Illinois $30,845 62% · 5 recipients
  2. Colorado $6,764 14% · 2 recipients
  3. Pennsylvania $4,330 9% · 5 recipients
  4. Texas $1,817 4% · 36 recipients
  5. Kansas $1,166 2% · 13 recipients

The top 5 of 33 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2021 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

347 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2021

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record