Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Gillian Wooldridge

Sports Medicine League City, TX Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1053722264 CMS profile 5599727

2220 E. League City Parkway, Suite 200, League City, TX 77573

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$105,995

346 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Gillian Wooldridge of League City, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $105,995 across 346 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Sports Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $80,692 128
2024 General $21,297 82
2023 General $1,215 45
2022 General $1,257 32
2021 General $712 19
2020 General $341 23
2019 General $480 17

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Gillian Wooldridge
  • Sports Medicine median
  • Middle half of Sports Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Gillian Wooldridge were reported at $80,692. Among 1,257 Sports Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $114 and the middle half received between $39 and $293.

Show as a table
Year Gillian Wooldridge Sports Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $480 $119 $35–$362 $163
2020 $341 $77 $24–$275 $114
2021 $712 $104 $28–$340 $132
2022 $1,257 $94 $31–$272 $149
2023 $1,215 $91 $34–$271 $160
2024 $21,297 $126 $38–$294 $164
2025 $80,692 $114 $39–$293 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Kyowa Kirin, Inc. $46,053 30 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $40,310 161 payments
  3. Radius Health, Inc. $16,185 98 payments
  4. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,790 4 payments
  5. Pacira Pharmaceuticals Incorporated $193 3 payments
  6. Novo Nordisk Inc $142 9 payments
  7. Horizon Therapeutics plc $138 2 payments
  8. Medtronic, Inc. $122 1 payment
  9. Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. $119 1 payment
  10. Ascendis Pharma, Inc. $112 1 payment
  11. Other $830 36 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $79,730 28 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $9,039 281 payments
  3. Honoraria $7,395 3 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $4,880 2 payments
  5. Travel and Lodging $4,798 18 payments
  6. Education $153 14 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. EVENITY $39,761 145 payments
  2. Tymlos Endocrinology $14,917 59 payments
  3. CRYSVITA Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 Fgf23 Blocking Antibody $14,527 12 payments
  4. Crysvita fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) blocking antibody. $14,293 7 payments
  5. STRENSIQ $1,790 4 payments
  6. Tymlos Endocrinology $843 31 payments
  7. Prolia $735 60 payments
  8. Zilretta $193 3 payments
  9. INTELLIS ADAPTIVESTIM $122 1 payment
  10. SEGLENTIS $119 1 payment
  11. Other $1,388 65 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 11 drugs

Part D claims

486

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$1,505,216

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

67.9%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Tymlos Abaloparatide Brand 258 $1,030,894
Forteo Teriparatide Brand 60 $302,778
Teriparatide Generic 30 $169,625
Raloxifene Hcl Generic 11 $551
Ultra-Fine Mini Pen Needle Pen Needle, Diabetic Brand 12 $478
Chlorthalidone Generic 25 $299
Alendronate Sodium Generic 39 $283
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 14 $118
Potassium Chloride Generic 11 $94
Levothyroxine Sodium Generic 13 $78

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 11 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 41 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$921,327

Of which drugs: $829,424

Medicare patients

481

Average age 75

Services billed

94,081

390 women, 91 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 75%
High blood pressure 72%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Depression 23%
Diabetes 21%
COPD 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 82 89,880 $768,771
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 24 2,340 $45,827
Hyaluronan or derivative, monovisc, for intra-articular injection, per dose J7327 Office 15 24 $12,543
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 11 12 $61

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 7 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Crysvita
  • Kyowa Kirin, Inc. $14,293
$14,293 — —
EVENITY
  • Amgen Inc. $794
$794 — 89,880
Tymlos
  • Radius Health, Inc. $274
$274 258 —
Prolia
  • Amgen Inc. $169
$169 — 2,340
ZEPBOUND
  • Lilly USA, LLC $24
$24 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 7 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

346 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Sports Medicine in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record