Product Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Crysvita

Drug Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 Fgf23 Blocking Antibody

NDC 42747-102-01

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,011,686

6,692 payments

Research payments

$171,462

3 payments

Through program year 2025, $1,011,686 in general payments and $171,462 in research payments were reported against Crysvita (Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 Fgf23 Blocking Antibody).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 General $1,011,686 6,692
2025 Research $171,462 3

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Kyowa Kirin, Inc. $1,011,686 6,692 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2025
  1. Anthony Portale Pediatrics · San Francisco, CA $48,019 5% · 45 payments
  2. Joshua Yang Pediatric Endocrinology · Orlando, FL $44,835 4% · 68 payments
  3. Laila Tabatabai Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism · Houston, TX $32,631 3% · 54 payments
  4. Suzanne Jan De Beur Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism · Charlottesville, VA $29,074 3% · 31 payments
  5. Langley Porter Psychiatric Hospital Teaching hospital · CA $29,000 3% · 5 payments

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Internal Medicine $245,178 28% · 699 practitioners
  2. Pediatric Endocrinology Pediatrics $137,420 15% · 136 practitioners
  3. Rheumatology Internal Medicine $122,096 14% · 301 practitioners
  4. Pediatrics $65,117 7% · 229 practitioners
  5. Internal Medicine $52,846 6% · 272 practitioners

The top 5 of 101 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2025. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2025
  1. California $176,356 17% · 449 recipients
  2. Texas $157,663 16% · 581 recipients
  3. Florida $114,551 11% · 223 recipients
  4. Connecticut $56,613 6% · 38 recipients
  5. Missouri $44,680 4% · 115 recipients

The top 5 of 54 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

Prescribed to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024

Part D claims

1,753

Prescriptions dispensed, refills included

Drug cost

$45,165,663

Paid at the pharmacy, in all

Prescribers

90

With 11 or more claims of it

Medicare Part D drugs matched to CRYSVITA, 2024
Part D drug Name match Relative to the largest Prescribers Claims Drug cost
Crysvita Burosumab-Twza Same name 90 1,753 $45,165,663

Matched to this product by name; CMS does not link its files to Open Payments, so a similar name can be a different strength, form or brand. Prescriber counts include only prescribers with 11 or more claims of the drug, because CMS publishes nothing below that. Part D covers drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries at a pharmacy; it does not include drugs given in a clinic or hospital, or patients with other insurance.

Largest prescribers

First 5 of 90 by claims · 2024

Two separate records. Claims come from Medicare and related payments from Open Payments. They are shown in one row because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

The prescribers with the most Part D claims of this drug in 2024
Prescriber Specialty State Claims Drug cost Related payments
Kathryn Dahir Endocrinology TN 46 $993,691 $9,013
Gary Gottesman Medical Genetics and Genomics MO 45 $1,249,972 $103
Erik Imel Endocrinology IN 38 $1,032,430 $15,280
Nicole Chan Internal Medicine NY 36 $897,667 None on record
Sumit Bhagra Endocrinology MN 34 $599,484 None on record

"No profile" means the prescriber has no Open Payments record here; "None on record" means no payment naming this product in the payment year. Related payments are general payments, and one that names several products is split evenly, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it. The list is the prescribers with the most claims, up to 100 per drug.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 90 with Patron
6,692 general · 3 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record