Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Evan Abramsky

Physician Assistant Delray Beach, FL Physician Assistant

NPI 1356319362 CMS profile 10733353

14610 S Military Trl Ste G3, Delray Beach, FL 33484

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,778

571 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Evan Abramsky of Delray Beach, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,778 across 571 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,848 101
2024 General $1,720 100
2023 General $1,876 99
2022 General $2,207 131
2021 General $2,128 140

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Evan Abramsky
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Evan Abramsky were reported at $1,848. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Evan Abramsky Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $2,128 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $2,207 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $1,876 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $1,720 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $1,848 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. UCB, Inc. $2,546 144 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $1,256 74 payments
  3. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $828 57 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $741 45 payments
  5. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $674 35 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $623 26 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $612 53 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $452 38 payments
  9. Radius Health, Inc. $359 19 payments
  10. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $237 2 payments
  11. Other $1,451 78 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,693 570 payments
  2. Education $85 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Cimzia $1,758 105 payments
  2. ORENCIA $828 57 payments
  3. Bimzelx $787 39 payments
  4. TREMFYA $781 28 payments
  5. SAPHNELO $741 45 payments
  6. EVENITY $624 33 payments
  7. Prolia $624 33 payments
  8. COSENTYX $482 39 payments
  9. XELJANZ $452 38 payments
  10. RINVOQ $438 20 payments
  11. Other $4,378 247 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 12 drugs

Part D claims

739

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$78,753

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

7.3%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 12 $66,590
Colchicine Generic 45 $2,908
Methylprednisolone Generic 191 $1,904
Alendronate Sodium Generic 148 $1,635
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 50 $1,575
Allopurinol Generic 76 $1,019
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 42 $1,011
Prednisone Generic 103 $920
Ibandronate Sodium Generic 12 $428
Duloxetine Hcl Generic 17 $331

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 12 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 66 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,264,767

Of which drugs: $703,022

Medicare patients

1,273

Average age 80

Services billed

69,966

894 women, 379 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 56%
Ischemic heart disease 42%
Depression 32%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Diabetes 27%
Cancer 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 233 21,600 $442,482
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 19 25,410 $218,440
Hyaluronan or derivative, gel-one, for intra-articular injection, per dose J7326 Office 35 58 $23,452
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 685 10,373 $7,742
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 270 610 $3,241
Methotrexate sodium, 50 mg J9260 Office 12 27 $28
Methotrexate sodium, 5 mg J9250 Office 11 32 $7

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 19 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Cimzia
  • UCB, Inc. $443
$443 — —
COSENTYX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $169
$169 — —
Bimzelx
  • UCB, Inc. $167
$167 — —
ORENCIA
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $165
$165 12 —
SAPHNELO
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $156
$156 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 19 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

571 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record